摘要
PSASP和中国版BPA是我国电力工业界应用广泛的电力系统仿真分析软件,PSS/E则在北美应用较广。不同仿真软件间的模型库有差别,分析比较了PSASP、BPA和PSS/E励磁系统模型的差异。在PSS/E上通过用户自定义功能建立了国内常用的PSASP1、7、12型励磁系统。阐述了PSS/E常规动态仿真和扩展动态仿真2种方式的用户自定义建模的方法和步骤。通过单机无穷大系统和我国某实际系统的PSASP、BPA和PSS/E动态仿真比较,证明了所建自定义励磁模型的正确性。
Power system simulation software （PSASP） and BPA （China Edition） are widely applied to power industry in China, while PSS/E is mainly used in North America. The model libraries of different simulation software are not same, so the authors compare and analyze the differences among excitation systems in PSASP, BPA and PSS/E. By means of user-defined function, the PSASP 1, PSASP 7 and PSASP 12 excitation systems, which are widely used in China, are built in PSS/E. The methods and procedures of user-defined modeling for both conventional dynamic simulation and expanded dynamic simulation in PSS/E are expounded. Through the comparison of dynamic simulation results of single-machine infinite bus system as well as a certain actual power system in China by PSASP, BPA and PSS/E respectively, the correctness of the proposed user-defined excitation system model is validated.
出处
《电网技术》
EI
CSCD
北大核心
2009年第18期78-83,共6页
Power System Technology
