期刊文献+

不同浓度罗哌卡因用于臂丛阻滞的临床研究 被引量:4

A comparison between different low concentrations of ropivacaine for lumbar plexus block
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察不同低浓度罗哌卡因用于臂丛阻滞下行手、腕部肌腱断裂吻合术时选用多大浓度可达到最佳的感觉与运动阻滞相分离的麻醉效果。方法随机抽取手、腕部肌腱断裂120例,臂丛阻滞成功病例,美国麻醉师协会(ASA)分级Ⅰ~Ⅱ级。随机分成三组,每组40例,分别用0.25%(A组)、0.3%(B组)、0.375%(C组)罗哌卡因麻醉。采用肌间沟臂丛阻滞法。用针刺法测感觉阻滞平面,用现时疼痛强度评分(PPI)评估术中疼痛,用改良Bromage法评估上肢运动神经阻滞程度,比较三组感觉、疼痛、运动阻滞及恢复上的异同。结果三组均能达到感觉阻滞。运动阻滞起效时间、最大运动阻滞时间、运动恢复时间:C组明显优于A组、B组(P<0.01)。术中PPI评分:A组疼痛不适者多于B、C组(P<0.01)。Bromage评分:运动神经阻滞C组明显强于A、B组(P<0.01)。结论0.3%的罗哌卡因可达到手、腕部肌腱吻合手术的麻醉要求。 Objective To observe the different low concentrations of roplvacaine for brachial plexus block in band and wrist tendon rupture anastomosis. Methods One hundred and twenty ASA I - II patients scheduled for hand and wrist tendon rupture anastomosis were randomly divided into 3 groups with 40 patients in each group. Brachial plexus block was performed aud 0.25% ( group A), 0.3% ( group B) and 0. 375% ropivacaine (group C) were administered in each group respectively. Measurement of the feeling of acupuncture block plane, PPI assessment of intraoperative pain and modified Bromage method were used to assess the degree of upper limb motor block. The similarities and differences of feeling, pain, motor block and recovery were compared among groups. Results There was,no significant difference in blockade effect among groups. However, longer onset time of motor block, shorter largest block exercise time and exercise time to restore were observed in group C compared with group A and group B ( P 〈0.01). PPI score was higher in group A than that in group B and group C ( P 〈0.01). Bromage score indicated that the effect of motor nerve block was significantly stronger in group C than that in group A and group B ( P 〈0.01 ). Conclusion 0.3% ropivacaine can be used in hand and wrist tendon surgery.
出处 《临床和实验医学杂志》 2009年第10期55-56,共2页 Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
关键词 罗哌卡因 浓度 臂丛阻滞 麻醉效果 Ropivaeaine Concentrations Braehial plexus block Anesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献21

共引文献67

同被引文献45

  • 1金勉,徐旭仲,王建光.神经刺激器引导下的肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞[J].温州医学院学报,2005,35(3):229-231. 被引量:5
  • 2姚长智,张伟,方力,何锡强,苑贵敏,张晓光.屈肌腱松解术后功能锻炼患者罗哌卡因或布比卡因臂丛阻滞的最低镇痛浓度[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2005,25(6):422-424. 被引量:11
  • 3农光,李泽均,黄伟芝,陶宗欣,邹艺.B超定位肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞的临床应用[J].华夏医学,2007,20(4):752-754. 被引量:13
  • 4Gautier P, Vandepitte C,Ramquet C, et al. The minimumeffective anesthetic volume of 0. 75% ropivacaine in ultra-sound -guided interscalene brachial plexus block [ J ]. Anes-thesia & Analgesia,2011,113(4) ;951 -955. 被引量:1
  • 5McClellan KJ, Faulds D. Ropivacaine: an update of its usein regional anaesthesia [ J ]. Drugs, 2000,60 ( 5 ) : 1065 -1093. 被引量:1
  • 6Klein SM, Greengrass RA, Steele SM, et al. A comparisonof 0. 5 % bupivacaine, 0. 5 % ropivacaine, and 0. 75 %ropivacaine for interscalene brachial plexus block [ J ]. AnesthAnalg,1998,87: 1316-1391. 被引量:1
  • 7McGlade DP, Kalpokas MV, Mooney PH. A comparison of0.5 % ropivacaine and 0.5 % bupivacaine for axillary bra-chial plexus anaesthesia[ J] . Anaesth Intensive Care, 1998 ,26:515 -520. 被引量:1
  • 8Raeder JC, Drosdahl S, Klaastad 0, et al. Axillary brachialplexus block with ropivacaine 7. 5 mg/ml. A comparativestudy with bupivacaine 5 mg/ml [ J ]. Acta AnesthesiolScand,1999,43:794-798. 被引量:1
  • 9Serradell A, Herrero R, Villanueva J A, et al. Compari- son of three different volumes of mepivacaine in axillary plexus block using multiple nerve stimulation [ J]. Br J Anaesth, 2003,91 (4) :519-524. 被引量:1
  • 10Barbosa F T, Pinto A L, da Cunha R M. comparative study of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of 20 ml of 0. 5, 0. 75, and 1% ropivacaine in posterior brachial plexus block [ J ]. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2009,59 ( 2 ) : 259 -260. 被引量:1

引证文献4

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部