摘要
目的了解现行的烟盒包装健康警语对北京、沈阳、上海、长沙、广州、银川等6个城市吸烟者的警示效应。方法采用多阶段抽样方法,在6个城市抽取4815名成年吸烟者进行入户调查,测量健康警语对其的警示效应,采用多因素Logistic回归分析健康警语对吸烟者警示作用的影响因素。结果6个城市调查对象中男性占94.9%。警示效应平均得分为1.38分(≥2分为有警示作用);过去1个月经常因健康警语而没有吸烟的比例为2.15%;只有13.31%的吸烟者会在吸烟时回避健康警语;因健康警语而经常考虑吸烟对健康危害的比例为8.26%,因烟盒上的健康警语很想戒烟的比例为5.29%。多因素分析提示,不同城市和吸烟时间长短是警语对吸烟者警示效应的影响因素。结论现行的烟盒健康警语已经失去应有的警示效应。6城市中大部分吸烟者不会回避烟盒上的健康警语或因健康警语而停止吸烟。也不会因警语而经常考虑吸烟危害或很想戒烟。
Objective To examine the effects of health warning on cigarette package on smokers in Beijing, Shenyang, Shanghai,Changsha, Guangzhou, and Yinchuan. Methods Multistage sampling was used to select 4815 smokers in six cities. Face-to-face interview was conducted to colledt related information. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to explore factors associated with warning effects. Results Among the participants,94.9% was male. Average score of warning effects was 1.38 （ effective score≥2）. Only 2.15 % of respondents often stop smoking because of warning labels, and 13.31% avoided warnings during the past one month. The proportion of considering the harm of smoking and planning to quit smoking because of noticing the warning label were only 8.26% and 5.29%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that different cities and smoking years were associated with warning effects of health labels on cigarette package. Conclusion Current health warning on cigarette package had no designed warning effects for smokers. It is necessary to renew the form of the warnings.
出处
《中国公共卫生》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2009年第10期1193-1195,共3页
Chinese Journal of Public Health
基金
加拿大健康研究中心(CIHR)
美国国立卫生院(NIH)
美国疾病预防控制中心(CDC)
中国疾病预防控制中心提供资助
美国罗斯维尔园多学科烟草使用研究中心项目(P50CA111236-02)
关键词
吸烟者
烟盒健康警语
警示效应
smoker
health warning labels on cigarette package
warning effect
