期刊文献+

3种静脉输液抽药手法的对比

Comparative analysis of three drug -pumping practice
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的教科书中的静脉输液加药抽药手法(教科书法)速度较慢,效率低,已不能适应临床工作需要,临床惯用的抽药法(习惯法)很容易导致注射器活塞轴的污染,为更好地适应临床工作需求,已探索、研究新的抽药手法(改良法)。方法通过临床观察、实践后采用新的改良法抽药,并将3种抽药方法的抽药速度及手污染注射器的机率进行对比。结果习惯法与改良法抽药速度明显高于教科书法,而改良法虽抽药速度低于习惯法,但有效地避免了注射器的污染。结论改良法既提高了工作效率,又保证了加药的安全性。 Objective The drug - pumping practice in intravenous infusion introduced in textbooks (textbook drug- pumping practice) was slow, less efficient and unadapted to the need of clinical work and traditional drug - pumping practice used in clinical work may lead to pollution of poison shaft of a injector. Therefore, in order to better satisfy the need of clinical work, it was necessary to explore new means ( improved one) to pump drugs. Methods By clinical observation, after being practiced, the new improved drug - pumping method was used. This paper compared the pumping speed and probability to pollute injector by hands of textbook in drugpumping practice, the traditional drug - pumping practice and improved drug - pumping practice. Results The pumping speed of traditional and improved drug - pumping practice were obviously quicker than textbook drugpumping practice, while improved practice was less quicker than traditional practice but avoids effectively injector being polluted. Conclusions Improved drugpumping practice not only increases operation efficiency, but also guarantees the safety of dosing process.
出处 《国际护理学杂志》 2009年第10期1433-1436,共4页 international journal of nursing
关键词 教科书法 习惯法 改良法 抽药速度 污染机率 Textbook drug - pumping practice Traditional drug - pumping practice Improved drug - pumping practice Pumping speed Probability of pollution
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献15

共引文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部