摘要
目的:为了解我市农村生活饮用水水质现状,为推进我市农村饮水安全工程建设提供依据。方法:对2008年57份水样检测结果通过spss13.0进行统计分析。结果:57份水样中不合格水样54份,不合格率为94.7%。其中出厂水不合格28份,不合格率为49.1%。末梢水不合格26份,不合格率为45.6%。两者没有统计学意义(χ2=0.39,P>0.5)。深井水不合格41份,不合格率为93.2%;泉水不合格4份,不合格率为100%;水库水不合格9份,不合格率为100%。深井水和泉水两者有显著性差异(χ2=10.78,P<0.005),深井水和水库水两者有显著性差异(χ2=6.82,P<0.005)。不同的水处理方式之间没有统计学意义(χ2=1.82,P>0.25)。结论:舞钢市农村生活饮用水水质质量不高,有关部门要加强水质处理和消毒工作,保障农村饮水安全。
Objective：To provide evidence for realising the status of water quality and promoting engineering construction of secure drinking water in the countryside in Wugang city Henan province. Methods：Carrying out statistical analysis on detecting results of 57eases of water samples in 2008. Results：Of 57cases, 54 are not qualified, disqualification rate is 94.7%. Among of total, 28 cases turning out from factoty are not quatified, rate is 49. 1% ; 26 cases of ending water are found, rate is 45.6%, there is on statistical significance between two gronps（χ^2 =0. 39, P 〉 0. 5 ）. Samples of disqualified phreatic water are 41 cases, rate is 93.2% ; spring water is 4, rate is 100% ; reservoir water is 9, rate is 100%. Significant difference is found between phreatic water and spring water group （χ^2 = 10.78, P 〈 0. 005 ） and between phreatic water and reservoir water group （χ^2 = 10. 78, P 〈 0. 005 ） . but there is no statistical difference between diffenrent two groups of methods of water treatment （χ^2 = 1.82, P 〉 0. 25 ）. Conclusion：Water quality in the countryside in Wugang city is bad, relative government departments should pay special attention to management and steriling of water to ensure the security of the drinking water.
出处
《中国卫生检验杂志》
CAS
2009年第9期2140-2141,共2页
Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology
关键词
农村
生活饮用水
水质检测
Countryside
Drinking water
Water quality monitoring
