摘要
先行行为作为不纯正不作为犯罪作为义务的形式,并非毫无疑义,但由于不作为与作为在原因力上的差异以及为了避免刑罚处罚的空隙,除几种特殊情形外一般应肯定先行行为作为义务来源。先行行为应当由刑法明定化,它的实质根据是行为人实施的危险前行为使其置于保护被害人特定法益的地位,而该地位本身含有防止危害结果发生的内容。
There is dispute on whether antecedent actions are the source of act duty in omission crimes. Considering the difference between the cause power of act and omission and the need to punish crimes, we should admit that antecedent actions are the source of act duty except under some special conditions. Antecedent actions should be legislated, and its substantial basis is that the actor＇ dangerous antecedent actions make him have the duty to protect the victim because the relationship between the actor and the victim requires the actor to prevent a danger to happen.
出处
《技术与创新管理》
CSSCI
2009年第5期681-683,共3页
Technology and Innovation Management
关键词
先行行为
存在根据
实质化
antecedent actions
existing basis
substance
