摘要
目的比较周围静脉和颈外静脉留置针穿刺,输入奥沙利铂及5-氟尿嘧啶后,对患者造成静脉炎及末梢神经损伤的观察。方法随机分为两组,比较两种方法给药后引起患者静脉炎和末梢神经损伤有无差异。结果颈外静脉留置针输入奥沙利铂,发生静脉炎较周围静脉留置针组明显偏低,其差异有显著意义(P<0.001),并且未发生一例末梢神经损伤。结论颈外静脉留置针输入奥沙利铂,对患者造成静脉炎的影响较轻,避免了末梢神经损伤,使患者易于接受,该方法适用于进行化疗的肿瘤患者。
Objective Periphery the comparison outside the vein and the neck the vein leaving alone needle puncture, after inputting Austria Sha Libo and 5-fluorine uracils, creates the phlebitis and the nerve ending damage observation to the patient. Methods Divides into two groups stochastically, after two methods for medicine whether there is causes the patient phlebitis and the nerve ending damages the difference. Results Outside the neck the vein leaving alone needle inputs Austria Sha Libo, has the phlebitis periphery vein leaving alone needle group obvious somewhat low, its difference has the remarkable significance （P〈0.001）, and has not had an example nerve ending damage. Conclusion Outside the neck the vein leaving alone needle inputs Austria Sha Libo, had phlebitis＇s influence to the patient to be light, has avoided the nerve ending damage, caused the patient easy to accept, this method was suitable for the tumor patient who carried on the chemotherapy.
出处
《当代医学》
2009年第27期98-99,共2页
Contemporary Medicine
关键词
周围静脉
颈外静脉
留置针
奥沙利铂
静脉炎
末梢神经
Outside the surroundings vein
the neck the vein
leaves alone the needle
Austria Sha Libo
the phlebitis
the nerve ending
