期刊文献+

师范专科新生心理健康及自我效能感状况调查 被引量:5

Mental health and its relationship with general self-efficacy and coping style among college freshman
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解2008级师专新生心理健康状况,探讨心理健康与一般自我效能感及应对方式的关系。方法对河北沧州师专2008级521名新生进行心理健康(UPI)、一般自我效能感、应对方式问卷调查。结果521份有效问卷中,最高分为50分,最低分为0分,平均分为(15.11±9.45)分;在心理健康状况的3种类型中,属于第1,2,3类的大学生分别有103,127,289人,占总数的20%,24%,56%;师专新生心理健康问题发生率为44%;不同性别及生源地、是否独生子女的学生之间心理健康水平差异无统计学意义;不同心理健康水平的新生一般自我效能感、应对方式的差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);新生的心理健康与应对方式、一般自我效能感均呈正相关(r=0.23,0.21,P<0.001);自我效能感、应对方式对心理健康有预测作用。结论可以通过对新生应对方式技能和一般自我效能感训练来提高大学生心理健康水平。 Objective To study mental health and its relationship with self-efficacy and coping style among college freshman. Methods A total of 521 college freshman were administered with UPI (University Personality Inventory) ,GSES (General Self-Efficacy Scale)and a questionnaire of coping style. Results The rate of mental health problems was 44%. There was no significant difference in mental health status between the freshman of different gender, from different areas, and from families with different number of children. There were differences in mental health between freshman with different self-efficacy and coping style (P 〈 0. 001 ). The mental health status was positively correlated with self-efficacy and coping style( r =0. 23,0. 21 ;P 〈0. 001 ). Conclusion The training of self-efficacy and coping style can improve mental health status among college freshman.
作者 袁锦芳
出处 《中国公共卫生》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第9期1056-1057,共2页 Chinese Journal of Public Health
基金 河北省教育厅人文社会科学研究指导计划项目(SZ080367)
关键词 师范专科生 心理健康 一般自我效能感 应对方式 college freshman mental health general self-efficacy coping styles
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献26

  • 1孙燕鸣,周庆环,石淑宵.长学制医学生心理健康水平的初步分析[J].中国高等医学教育,2006(2):63-65. 被引量:3
  • 2Schwarzer R,Aristi B,Iwawaki S,et al.The assessment of:Comparison of Chinese,Indonesian,Japanese,and Korean version of the General selfEfficacy Scale.Psychologia,1997,40:1-13. 被引量:1
  • 3丛中 高文凤.一般自我效能感量表[A].见:中国行为医学科学编辑委员会编.行为医学量表手册[C].北京:中华医学电子音像出版社,2005.187. 被引量:2
  • 4Schwarzer R,Aristi B.Optimistic self beliefs:assessment of general perceived self- efficacy in Thirteen cultures.Word Psychology,1997,3:177-190. 被引量:1
  • 5[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104 被引量:1
  • 6[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June 被引量:1
  • 7[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972 被引量:1
  • 8[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321 被引量:1
  • 9[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619 被引量:1
  • 10[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182 被引量:1

共引文献7662

同被引文献62

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部