摘要
在一体化进程中,为了在国际上扮演重要角色,欧盟致力于发展欧洲民事力量和军事力量的建设。然而由于两者都属于传统国家的力量模式而无法发挥欧盟自身的特性。冷战后随着欧盟日益进入后民族时代,它的国际身份发生了重大变化,体现出超越威斯特伐利亚体系的特点。伊安.曼纳斯等学者试图用"规范性力量欧洲"的概念来对欧盟后民族、后现代的国际角色进行界定,但是由于忽视了尊重文化多样性、成员国利益和美国的阻力等因素,存在一定的局限性。
The EU tried to develop its civil power and military power in order to be able to play a key role in international relations in the process of European integration. Since both the civil power and military power belong to the traditional model of state power, they could not accord with EU＇s own identity. After the cold war and with the inauguration of the post-national era, EU＇s international identity changed and manifested some characteristics alien to the Westphalia system. Ian Manners used the concept of “normative power of Europe” to define the post-national and post- modern international role of the EU, which, however, exhibits some limitations due to his oblivion to cultural diversity, interests of member sates and resistance from the U. S.
出处
《上海交通大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第4期38-45,共8页
Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词
欧盟国际角色
欧洲一体化
规范性力量
EU＇s international role
European integration
normative power
