期刊文献+

高管冲突与团队决策绩效——基于控制模式的调节分析 被引量:21

Top Management Team Conflict and Team Decision Performance:The Moderating Role of Control Mode
原文传递
导出
摘要 整合冲突理论与公司治理控制理论,揭示控制模式(所有制)在高管冲突与团队决策绩效关系中的调节作用,利用中国10个省345份国有企业和民营企业样本,运用层级回归分析对假设进行验证。研究结果表明,高管认知冲突有助于提高团队决策绩效,高管情感冲突负向影响团队决策绩效;同时所有制对于两类冲突的调节作用不同,相对于国有企业,民营企业中高管团队情感冲突与团队决策绩效的负相关关系显著减弱,高管团队认知冲突与团队决策绩效的正相关关系并无显著差别。研究发现,要有效提高高管团队决策绩效,既应通过所有制的改变降低情感冲突对决策的负面作用,也应该寻求体制调整之外的具体管理方式适度激发认知冲突。 Integrating conflict theory and control mode perspective, the paper examines the moderating effect of control mode (ownership structure) on the relationship between top management team (TMT) conflict and TMT decision performance using a hierarchical regression analysis of 345 samples from 10 Chinese provinces' survey. The results demonstrate that TMT cognitive conflict positively influence TMT decision performance, and TMT affeetive conflict negatively influence TMT decision performance. Affective conflict of top management team in private enterprises less negatively correlated with TMT decision performance than state-owned enterprises. The correlation between TMT cognitive conflict and TMT decision performance is not significantly different between state-owned enterprises and private enterprises. In sum, this findings probably means that one should change ownership structure to diminish negative effect of TMT affective conflict and effectively improve TMT decision performance, but also exploit some specific management style to stimulate cognitive conflict appropriately.
出处 《管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第4期31-40,共10页 Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(70732004 70672107) 教育部人文社会科学青年项目(07JC630028)~~
关键词 高层管理团队 情感冲突 认知冲突 团队决策绩效 控制模式 top management team affective conflict cognitive conflict top management team decision performance control mode
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1张维迎.产权安排与企业内部的权力斗争[J].经济研究,2000,35(6):41-50. 被引量:188
  • 2Hambrick D C, Mason P A. Upper Echelons : The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 1984,9 ( 2 ) : 193- 206. 被引量:1
  • 3Amason A C. Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making:Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39 (1) :123-148. 被引量:1
  • 4Simons T L, Peterson R S. Task Conflict and Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000,85 ( 1 ) : 102-111. 被引量:1
  • 5王国锋,李懋,井润田.高管团队冲突、凝聚力与决策质量的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2007,10(5):89-93. 被引量:71
  • 6刘军,刘松博.企业高层管理团队冲突管理方式:理论及证据[J].经济理论与经济管理,2008,28(2):58-64. 被引量:17
  • 7Dhingra H L. Patterns of Ownership and Control in Canadian Industry: A Study of Large. Non-Financial Private Corporations [ J ]. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 1983,8( 1 ) :21-44. 被引量:1
  • 8Hambrick D C, Finkelstein S. The Effects of Ownership Structure on Conditions at the Top:The Case of CEO Pay Raises [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1995,16(3) :175-193. 被引量:1
  • 9Guetzkow H, Gyr J. An Analysis of Conflict in Decision-making Groups [ J ] . Human Relations, 1954,7 (3) :367-381. 被引量:1
  • 10Priem R, Price K. Process and Outcome Expectations for the Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus Techniques of Strategic Decision Making [ J]. Group and Organization Studies, 1991,16(2) : 206-225. 被引量:1

二级参考文献137

共引文献435

同被引文献427

引证文献21

二级引证文献192

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部