摘要
目的:评价腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)的临床价值。方法:对35例子宫良性病变者行LAVH手术的临床治疗进行分析,并与腹腔镜Doderlein式子宫切除术(LDH)32例进行比较。结果:两组手术在手术时间,术后镇痛,肛门排气时间,住院时间等方面差异无统计学意义,但术中出血量比较:LAVH组(96.2±58.56)mL,LDH组(186.2±62.5)mL,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:LAVH手术镜处理子宫动脉,能有效控制术中出血量,值得临床推广应用。
Objective： To evaluate the clinical application of Laparoscope Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy. Methods： 35 patients with uterus none-malignant pathological changes who were treated by Laparoscope Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy（LVAH）were analyzed retrospectively and be compare with 32 patients who were treated by Laparoscope- Doderlein Hysterectomy（LDH）. Results： There were no significant different between the two groups in relieving pain after surgery, recovering of stomache-intestinal and the time of operation. There were significant different in bleeding in operation between two groups. Conclusion： LVAH can reduce bleeding in operation effectively and deserving further popularization.
出处
《华西医学》
CAS
2009年第7期1834-1835,共2页
West China Medical Journal
