摘要
杜文秀从未同任何外国政府建立过什么关系,到过大理的仅有法国安邺所率领的探险队,但当即被杜文秀所驱逐。所谓"回民使节"这一杜文秀被谴责的主要事件,先是由腾越柳映苍所策划,继则由刘道衡在其中扮演主要的角色。从英缅政府行政日志所揭露的事实来看,刘道衡的使英与杜文秀并无关系。这个近似闹剧的历史小插曲之所以被大肆渲染,是英国在印度和缅甸当局由于政治上的需要而制造出来的。真相如此,对杜文秀的谴责自然无从成立。且不论云南回民在反抗清政府统治者的斗争中的英勇表现如何,事实上,由于云南回民起义的结果,在杜文秀的直接抗拒或是起义的间接影响下,英法窥探云南的计划受到打击,被推迟了18年。因此,杜文秀在这场英勇斗争中的领导地位,是不应加以湮没的。
Du Wenxiu had no relations with foreign powers, and the only French exploration team once arrived at Dali was also expelled by Du Wenxiu＇ s forces. As to the incident of ＂the Hui＇ s Envoys＂ that made Du Wenxiu receive denouncement, we believe it was plotted by Teng Yue and then exaggerated by Liu Daoheng. Files kept by the British-Myanmar Government show that Liu Daoheng＇ s trip to Britain had nothing to do with Du Wenxiu＇ s Dali Administration ; and the exaggeration of such an incident was result of British - Myanmar Government＇ s political demand. As such, the denouncement made to Du Wenxiu is absolutely groundless. In fact, it is the direct and indirect influence of Hui＇ s uprising and Du Wenxiu＇ s refusal to support the rebellion force that made the British-French exploration to Yun nan delayed for 18 years, therefore, Du Wenxiu＇ s position as a leader should not be ignored.
出处
《回族研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第3期5-25,共21页
