摘要
从《国朝汉学师承记》、《国朝经师经义目录》、《国朝宋学渊源记》看,江藩基本把握住了戴震的学术全貌,比较注重戴震对友朋后学的影响,当然,这两点处处都渗透着江藩的"纯汉学"眼光;江藩对戴震以"晓徵为第二人"颇有微词,这是缘于他认为戴氏之学低于钱大昕,实际上他在多处是惠戴并称的;江藩品人论学多以戴震为参照,其前辈学者及友朋论戴惠之学亦无贵己贱彼之迹象。认为吴皖分帜之观念始于江藩且其有重吴略皖之倾向,实有武断之处。
From The Sinologieal Pedigree of Qing Dynasty, The Catalogue of Confucian Masters And Their Works of Qing Dy- nasty, The Song Sehool Pedigree of Qing Dynasty, JiangFan almost grasps all features of DaiZhen＇ s learning thought, and pays great attention to DaiZhen＇ s influenee on his friends and later students, eertainly many plaees were seeping JiangFan＇ s ＂pure si- nology view＂ ; JiangFan is not satisfied with DaiZhen＇ evaluation on Qian Daxin. ＂The later one is the second person＂, its eause for his thinking that DaiZhen＇ s learning aehievement is lower than Qian Daxin, in faet, his evaluation on DaiZhen is often equal to HuiDong; Furthermore, JiangFan evaluates that the others are often based on the eritie of DaiZhen, the senior seholars and the friends of JiangFan are also not higher-or-lower than the one or the others. So it is not sensible to think that the idea of the opposi- tion of Wu - Wan Sehools is sent from Jiangfan and he is higher-or-lower than the one or the others.
出处
《重庆工商大学学报（社会科学版）》
2009年第4期150-155,共6页
Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University：Social Science Edition
关键词
江藩
戴震
昊皖分帜
JiangFan
DaiZhen
the opposition of Wu - Wan Schools
