摘要
目的:观察外剥内扎加内括约肌侧切横缝术与传统外剥内扎术治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效。方法:将180例环状混合痔患者随机分成试验组(外剥内扎加内括约肌侧切横缝术)和对照组(传统外剥内扎术),各90例。观察两组患者术后治疗效果及术后并发症情况。结果:外剥内扎加内括约肌侧切横缝术,手术损伤小,皮桥保留较多,术后并发症少,术后肛门狭窄率明显降低、愈合快。结论:外剥内扎加内括约肌侧切横缝术治疗环状混合痔具有较好的效果,并能有效减少术后并发症及后遗症。
Objective： To observe the clinical curative effect that outside shell inside firm the side adding inside the sphincter slice horizontal and the tradition outside shells inside firm shu treated an annular mixture hemorrhoid. Methods： 180 annular mixture hemorrhoid sufferer＇s random being divided into test group （outside shell inside finn the side adding inside the sphincter slice horizontal） and matched control （the tradition outside shells inside firm technique）, 90 cases respectively. Observed two groups post-operative treatment effect and post-operative complications circumstance. Results： Outside shell inside finn the side adding inside the sphincter slice horizontal met the Shu, surgical operation the anus hurt sterigma, the skin bridge reserved more, the post-operative complications were little, post-operative anus stricture the rate obviously lower, heal quickly and experiment a set of better than matched control. Conclusion： Outside shell inside finn the side adding inside the sphincter slice horizontal meet the Shu treats an annular mixture hemorrhoid to have better effect, and can effectively reduce post-operative complications
出处
《中国当代医药》
2009年第16期21-22,27,共3页
China Modern Medicine
关键词
两种术式
环状混合痔
临床比较
Two kinds of methods
Annular mixture hemorrhoid
Clinical comparison
