期刊文献+

原发性高血压住院患者实施系统性健康教育的干预效果 被引量:4

The intervention effect of systematic health education carried out to primary hypertension patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价原发性高血压住院患者实施系统性健康教育的干预效果。方法320例原发性高血压住院患者随机分为干预组与非干预组,对干预组实施系统性健康教育,采用SF-36健康量表评价患者生活质量,同时观察血压变化情况,住院治疗2~4周后进行效果评价。结果干预前两组的收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)均无统计学差异(P〉0.05),干预后其干预差值均存在显著性差异(P〈0.01)。干预前两组各项生存质量指标均无统计学差异(P〉0.05),干预后干预组躯体疼痛、情感职能、精神健康明显优于非干预组(P〈0.05)。结论在药物治疗的基础上实施系统性健康教育能够更有效地控制患者血压,改善患者生活质量。 Objective To evaluate the intervention effect of systematic health education carried out to primary hypertension patients.Methods Totally 320 primary hypertension patients were randomly divided into intervention group and non-intervention group.Systematic health education was carried out to intervention group.Patients' life quality was evaluated with SF-36 health scale,and the change of blood pressure was observed at the same time.Effect evaluation was taken after treatment two to four weeks.Results There was no significant difference in systolic pressure(SBP) and diastolic pressure(DBP) of two groups before intervention(P〉0.05),while there was significant difference in post-intervention values and difference between pre-and post-intervention(P〈0.01).There was no significant difference in life quality indexes of two groups' pre-intervention(P〉0.05).The body pain,emotional functions and mental health of the intervention group post-intervention were obviously better than the non-intervention(P〈0.05).Conclusion Based on drug therapy,the implementation of systematic health education could control patients' blood pressure and improve patients' life quality more effectively.
作者 李影平
机构地区 广元市中心医院
出处 《局解手术学杂志》 2009年第4期237-239,共3页 Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery
关键词 高血压 健康教育 生活质量 hypertension health education life quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献50

  • 1全国血压抽样调查协作组.中国人群高血压患病率及其变化趋势[J].高血压杂志,1995,3(A01):7-13. 被引量:508
  • 2陈晓晴,王军.影响高血压患者服药依从性的因素及护理对策[J].实用医药杂志,2006,23(9):1083-1084. 被引量:11
  • 3刘贤臣.论病人的依从性[J].国外医学:社会医学分册,1988,5(4):237-237. 被引量:44
  • 4翟萍.高血压患者自我管理失败原因分析[J].实用全科医学,2007,5(8):713-713. 被引量:16
  • 5Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al.SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide.Boston: New England Medical Center the Health Institute,1993.1-12. 被引量:1
  • 6Perneger TV, Leplege A, Etter JF,et al.Validation of a French-language version of the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36) in young healthy adults.J Clin Epidemiol, 1995,48:1051-1060. 被引量:1
  • 7Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D.Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.J Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46:1417-1432. 被引量:1
  • 8Gandek B, Ware JE Jr.Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach.International Quality of Life Assessment.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:953-959. 被引量:1
  • 9顾杏元,金丕焕.直线回归与相关.见: 金丕焕,主编.医用统计方法.上海:上海医科大学出版社,1993.115-119. 被引量:1
  • 10Lam CL, Gandek B, Ren XS, et al.Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese(HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1139-1147. 被引量:1

共引文献2783

同被引文献25

引证文献4

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部