摘要
目的比较腹腔子宫肌瘤挖除术的临床效果。方法将2005年6月～2008年5月间370例子宫肌瘤患者随机分为腹腔镜手术组(196例)和剖腹手术组(174例),比较两组术中、术后情况,进而回顾性分析。结果两组年龄、体重、剖腹术史等方面比较无显著性意义(P>0.05),手术时间腹腔镜组(82.09±23.51)min,剖腹组(84.65±30.48)min(P<0.01)。出血量腹腔镜组(23.14±24.02)ml,剖腹组(85.56±65.83)ml(P<0.01)。术后住院腹腔镜组(4.22±1.00)d,剖腹组(6.74±1.76)d(P<0.01)。结论腹腔镜子宫肌瘤挖除术具有创伤小、术中出血少、术后恢复快及住院时间短等优点,是目前最为理想的微创治疗子宫肌瘤的手术之一。
Objective Digs out the technique compared with the abdominal cavity fibroid the clinical effect. Methods 370 example fibroid patient divides into the peritoneoscope surgery group stochastically June, 2005 from to May, 2008 （196 examples） and cuts open the belly the surgery group （174 examples）, after two groups of techniques, technique situation, then review analysis.. Results Two groups of aspects and so on ages, body weight, ventrotomy history compare the non-significance significance （P〉0.05）, the surgery time peritoneoscope group （82.09±23.51） min, cuts open the belly the group （84.65±30.48） min （P〈0.01）. Leaves the volume of blood peritoneoscope group （23.14± 24.02） ml, cuts open the belly the group （85.56±68.13） ml （P〈0.01）. After the technique, is hospitalized the peritoneoscope group （4.22±1.00） d, cuts open the belly the group （6.74±1.76） d （P〈0.01）. Conclusion The peritoneoscope fibroid digs out the technique to ＇have the wound to be small, in after the technique bleeds, the technique, few restores quick and in hospital time short and so on merits, most ideal micro creates one at present treatment fibroid＇s surgeries.
出处
《当代医学》
2009年第22期4-5,共2页
Contemporary Medicine
关键词
腹腔镜
剖腹术
子宫肌瘤
Peritoneoscope
Ventrotomy
Fibroid
