期刊文献+

论欧共体对WTO争端解决机制的政策与实践 被引量:3

European Community's Policy and Practice of the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 欧共体/欧盟以积极的态度广泛而又深入地参与了以GATT/WTO为核心的多边贸易体制的活动,并逐步取得GATT争端解决机制中的专属当事方地位,使得欧共体及其成员国在WTO中具有双重成员资格。在实践中,欧共体对GATT争端解决机制的态度经历了从"消极应诉"到"积极利用"的转变,且将WTO争端解决机制作为一个有效的对外贸易政策工具。从"香蕉案"可以看出,欧共体拖延执行DSB的裁决有体制、利益和DSU各方面的深层原因。因此,欧共体对WTO争端解决机制采取的政策具有两面性,并将WTO争端解决机制纳入其国际贸易执法体系,建立了处理WTO贸易诉讼的官民合作的公私伙伴关系。 European Community / European Union has participated in the activity about the multilateral trade system of GATT/WTO with the positive attitude, and has GAIT Dispute Settlement exclusive principal's status of mechanism, makes European'Community and their member state have double member qualifications among WTO progressively. In practice, European Community's attitude to GATT Dispute Settlement Mechanism through passivism to actively, and make WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism as an effective foreign trade policy tool. It can find out from the Banana case, that the deep reason of European Community delays carrying out DSB with system, interests and DSU. So European Community's policy has dual characters of WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism, and makes it into their international trade enforce system, establishes the cooperation partnership between public and private about the people and ofricers to WTO trade lawsuit.
作者 余敏友
出处 《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第4期50-60,共11页 Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
关键词 欧盟 WTO 贸易争端 DSB 国家利益 European Union WTO trade dispute DSB national benefit
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Nicholas Emiliou and David O' keeffe (eds.),The European Union and World Trade Law,John Wiley & Sons Publishers,1996,p.265. 被引量:1
  • 2See John H.Jackson,The World Trade System-Law and Policy of International Economic Relations,Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press1989,pp.85-88. 被引量:1
  • 3See Petersmann,International and European Foreign Trade Law:GATT Dispute Settlement Proceedings against the EEC,Common Market Law Review,Vol.22 (1985),pp.441-487. 被引量:1
  • 4香蕉进口销售和分销机制(DS364),see http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds364_e.htm(2008年8月13日访问). 被引量:1
  • 5http://europa.eu.int/comm/trade/miti/dispute/banabkg.htm (11 April 2001). 被引量:1
  • 6http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds26_e.htm. 被引量:1
  • 7仲裁报告.(WT/DS26/15,WT/DS48/13)第38-39段. 被引量:1
  • 8WT/DS27/ARB/ECU,24 March 2000,p 177. 被引量:1
  • 9Yenkong Ngangjoh H.:Collective Countermeasures and the WTO Dispute Settlement:'Solidarity Measures Revisited',Nordic Journal of Commercial Law,Issue 2004 # 2. 被引量:1
  • 10RODRIK,DANI:The Global Governance of Trade as if Development Really Mattered,Oct.2001,p.33.http://www.undp.org/mainundp/propoor/docs/pov_globalgovernancetrade_pub.pdf (2008年8月14日访问). 被引量:1

共引文献16

同被引文献24

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部