摘要
对驰名商标给予特殊保护几乎为各国商标立法的通例,而认定驰名商标是特殊保护的前提。目前,我国实行行政认定和司法认定双轨制,且实行司法认定的时间比行政认定的时间短,相关规定尚不完善,司法认定的效力备受关注,人们对司法认定也产生了一些认识上的误区。这就有必要深入阐明司法认定的基础与原则,更好地指导驰名商标司法认定的实践与立法。司法认定驰名商标具有法理基础和实践基础,并应坚持因需认定与个案有效的原则,树立和稳固司法认定的权威性,平衡好认定的驰名商标所有者与其他经营者及消费者的利益。
Well-known trademarks enjoy special protection, which has almost become general orders in trademark legislation of every country and also remained a precondition for affirming famous trademarks. Our country is currently adopting two-tracking system of administrative affirmation and judicial affirmation. However, the execution period of judicial affirmation is shorter than that of administrative one, and related regulations deserve improvement, so the effectiveness of judicial affirmation has drawn great attention and caused some misunderstandings in cognizance. It is necessary to expound the basis and principle of judicial affirmation in order to guide judicial affirmation of well-known trademarks in practice and legislation. Certifying famous trademarks judicially has its bases in laws and practice. We should hold up the rule of affirmation to meet demands and that of cases validity, establish and strengthen authority of judicial affirmation, and balance the interests between famous trademark holders, other managers and consumers.
出处
《学术交流》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第7期55-58,共4页
Academic Exchange
基金
2007年度河北省软科学课题<知识产权产出与保护研究>(07457202D-7)
关键词
驰名商标
司法认定
个案有效
well-known trademark
judicial affirmation
case validity
