摘要
作为世界反垄断法的典型代表,美国反托拉斯法和欧盟竞争法在对搭售行为的规制方面可谓是影响深远。从欧美竞争法规制搭售行为的立法及实践来看,两大立法体系共同并主要关注的问题是对拥有市场力量的经济实力的控制,因其所实施的搭售行为很容易威胁或阻碍竞争。但二者的立足点、判断原则以及诉讼方面仍存在差异,体现了欧美竞争法规制搭售行为的不同特色。比较研究这些问题,对我国竞争法规制该行为的发展和完善有着较大的现实意义。
As typical representatives of anti-monopoly laws of the world, the regulation of antitrust law of USA and the competition law of EU for the tying arrangement have made a deep and signifi- cant influence. In terms of the legislation and practices of the competition law of EU and USA reg- ulating tie-in, both systems control the formation of the big market power, for their tie-in maybe threaten or hinder competition. However, there are apparent differences on standpoint, judgment principles and lawsuit between the two systems, which show great different characteristics. The comparative study of issues has realistic significance to the development and perfection of the competition law of China in regulating tie-in.
出处
《山西农业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2009年第4期411-414,共4页
Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University:Social Science Edition
关键词
搭售行为
竞争法
违法原则
合理原则
Tying arrangement
Competition law
Illegal principle
Rule of reason
