摘要
在我国,学理上和司法实务上对民事证据规则仅仅停留在一般规则意义上的分析,即仅仅注意了规则逻辑上的自洽性和经验上的合理性。因此,不仅缺乏对证据规则之法理的考量,而且缺乏把证据规则与诉讼结构相结合的思想。民事证据收集和调查制度亦如此。所以,完善其制度必须根据其法理来界定民事证据收集和调查的含义,并将其法理与诉讼结构相结合来构建正当性的证据制度。
In China, both of the academic and judicial practice of the civil rules of evidence just focus on superficial analysis, which is only concerned with self-consistent in logic and reasonability in experience. Consequently, it is not only lack of jurisprudence in civil evidence but also an idea, combinating the structure of civil procedure with civil evidence. So is the systems of evidence collection and investigation. Thus, it is necessary to define the meaning of evidence collection and evidence investigation according to the jurisprudence. Besides, it needs to combine the jurisprudence of evidence collection and evidence investigation with the structure of civil procedure in order to build the legitimacy of the systems of evidence.
出处
《河南公安高等专科学校学报》
2009年第3期65-68,共4页
Journal of Henan Public Security Academy
关键词
证据
证据收集
证据调查
Evidence
Evidence collection
Evidence investigation
