期刊文献+

劳动雇佣与公司税负:就业鼓励抑或预算软约束 被引量:26

Employment and Corporate Effective Tax Rate:Employ Incentive or Soft-budget Constraint
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以2003—2006年度中国制造业上市公司为样本对企业劳动雇佣与税负关系进行微观层面的实证研究。在控制了相关企业特征变量后,实证结果表明:表征雇佣的绝对规模、增量规模、雇员销售密度与公司实际税负负相关,而在非优惠区的上市公司这一关系则更为显著,说明了公司劳动雇佣规模越大,实际税率(ETR)越低。无论公司是否处于优惠区域,超额雇佣程度越深,实际税负越低,地方国有企业的雇佣—税负弹性系数最大。此外,在优惠区内上市公司雇佣—税负弹性系数不受地方政府财政宽裕程度和外部失业压力的影响,而在非优惠区内则显著正相关。本文首次从微观企业层面为积极就业财税政策提供了经验证据,以超额雇佣—实际税负间显著负相关关系验证了转轨经济中的政策性负担——财政补贴机制,并进一步讨论了这一政企互动行为的外部约束机制。 Using the data of manufacturing listed company from 2003-2006, this paper makes a positive research on the relationship between employment and corporate effective tax rate. After controlling the finn characteristic variable, we find a negative relation between labor employee variables and ETR, and the significant relation existing of observers in the non-tax favorite area. The company with higher labor redundancy has lower ETR, especially local state owned company. And the ample fiscal and unemployment pressure will affect the employment-ETR elasticity positively in the tax favorite area.
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第5期139-149,共11页 China Industrial Economics
基金 教育部博士点基金项目(批准号 教技发中心函(2006)226号) 国家自然科学基金项目"大股东控制下的企业行为研究"(批准号 70772100)
关键词 劳动雇佣 超额雇佣 实际税率 employment redundant labor effective tax rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Derashid, Check and Hao Zhang. Effective Tax Rates and the Industrial Policy Hypothesis: Evidence from Malaysia[J]. Journal of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation,2003, (12). 被引量:1
  • 2Gupta,S., and K. Newberry. Determinants of the Variability of Corporate Effective Tax Rates: Evidence from Longitudinal Data[J]. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,1997,16(1). 被引量:1
  • 3Kornai, Janos. Resource-Constrained Versus Demand-Constrained Systems[J]. Econometrica, 1979,47 (4). 被引量:1
  • 4Lin, J.Y.f., F. Cai, and Z. Li. Competition, Policy Burdens, and State-owned Enterprise Reform [J]. American Economic Review, 1998, (88). 被引量:1
  • 5Nickell,Stephen. Competition and Corporate Performance[J]. the Journal of Political Economy, 1996,104(4). 被引量:1
  • 6Porcano,T. Corporate Tax Rates: Progressive, Proportional, or Regressive [J]. The Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 1986,7(2). 被引量:1
  • 7Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. Politicians and Firms[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994,(109). 被引量:1
  • 8Shelvin,T.,and S. Porter. The Corporate Tax Comeback in 1987:Some Further Evidence [J]. The Journal of American Taxation Association, 1992,14(1). 被引量:1
  • 9Stickney,C., and V.McGee. Effective Corporate Tax Rates: The Effect of Size, Capital Intensity ,Leverage, and Other Factors[J]. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 1982, 1(2). 被引量:1
  • 10Zimmerman, J. Tax and Firm Size[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1983,5(2). 被引量:1

二级参考文献113

共引文献2062

同被引文献519

引证文献26

二级引证文献201

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部