期刊文献+

吸入七氟醚与丙泊酚复合雷米芬太尼麻醉在全胃切除手术中的比较 被引量:9

A comparison of sevoflurane and remifentanil-propofol anesthesia in patients undergoing total gastrectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较七氟醚吸入与丙泊酚复合雷米芬太尼麻醉在全胃切除手术中的应用效果。方法40例ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级择期全胃切除术患者随机均分为七氟醚组(S组)和丙泊酚复合雷米芬太尼组(P组)。记录围麻醉期各时点的血流动力学、脑电双频指数(BIS)、麻醉药浓度及用量、麻醉恢复期时间和苏醒期不良反应。结果麻醉期两组DBP、MAP、HR均较麻醉前显著下降(P<0.05)。两组患者术中均能维持足够的麻醉深度(BIS45~60),术中血流动力学平稳。麻醉恢复期P组躁动、呛咳发生率明显低于S组(P<0.05)。结论七氟醚吸入麻醉或丙泊酚复合雷米芬太尼静脉麻醉均可安全应用于全胃切除手术。 Objective To compare the efficacy of sevoflurane inhalation and remifentanil-propofol anesthesia in patients undergoing total gastrectomy. Methods Forty ASA class Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients with gastric cancer were divided into sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia (group S) and remifentanil-propofol intravenous anesthesia(group P), with 20 cases each. Perioperative hemodynamic veriables, bispectral index (BIS) values and end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane were continuously monitored, The time of recovery from anesthesia and adverse reactions of anesthesia were recorded as well. Results Compared with those before anesthesia, BP and HR were significantly decreased (P% 0. 05). The depth of anesthesia in both groups was maintained well with BIS in 45-60 and vital signs were stable during operation. The recovery from anesthesia was quicker in group P than that in group S. The incidences of restlessness and couphing were obviously lower in group P than those in group S (P〈0.05). Conclusion Either sevoflurane inhalation or remifentanil-propofol intravenous anesthesia can be used safely in total gastrectomy.
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第5期373-375,共3页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
关键词 七氟醚 雷米芬太尼 丙泊酚 Sevoflurane Remifentanil Propofol
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献37

  • 1盛净.心率变异性:一种测定心脏自主神经张力的方法[J].国外医学(心血管疾病分册),1995,22(4):215-216. 被引量:14
  • 2王伟鹏 李立环主译.临床麻醉学(第4版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.298-299. 被引量:10
  • 3Kissin I.Depth of anesthesia and bispectral index monitoring.Anesth Analg,2000,90:1114-1117. 被引量:1
  • 4Glass PS,Bloom M,Kearse L,et al.Bispectral analysis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol,midazolam,isoflurane,and alfentanil in healthy volunteers.Anesthesiology,1997,86:836-847. 被引量:1
  • 5Rampil IJ.A primer for EEG signal processing in anesthesia.Anesthesiology,1998,89:980-1002. 被引量:1
  • 6Jadad AR,Moore RA,Carroll D,et al.Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials:is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials,1996,17:1-12. 被引量:1
  • 7Gan TJ,Glass PS,Windsor A,et al.Bispectral Index monitoring allows faster emergence and improved recovery from propofol,alfentanil and nitrous oxide anesthesia.BIS Utility Study Group.Anesthesiology,1997,87:808-815. 被引量:1
  • 8Yli Hankala A,Vakkuri A,Annila P,et al.EEG bispectral index monitoring in sevoflurane or propofol anaesthesia:analysis of direct costs and immediate recovery.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,1999,43:545-549. 被引量:1
  • 9Luginbuhl M,Wuthrich S,Petersen Felix S,et al.Different benefit of bispectral index (BIS) in desflurane and propofol anesthesia.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2003,47:165-173. 被引量:1
  • 10Struys MM,De Smet T,Versichelen LF,et al.Comparison of closedloop controlled administration of propofol using Bispectral Index as the controlled variable versus "standard practice" controlled administration.Anesthesiology,2001,95:6-17. 被引量:1

共引文献436

同被引文献67

引证文献9

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部