期刊文献+

中国幼儿智力量表的编制Ⅱ.效度研究 被引量:2

Chinese Intelligence Scale for Young Children(CISYC): Validity Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对中国幼儿智力量表(CISYC)进行效度检验。方法:考察常模样本中各年龄组各分测验成绩的变化趋势,量表的内部相关、因素分析等;CISYC与其它智力测验(C-WYCSI和K-ABC)、反应时及HRB进行相关。结果:常模样本中各年龄组各分测验粗分均值均随年龄增长而呈稳定的递增趋势,各分测验、各成份分与IQ相关及因素分析结果均表明量表具有较好的内部结构一致性;CISYC的智商与C-WYCSI的FIQ相关0.83,与K-ABC心理加工总分相关0.71;CISYC智商与反应时相关-0.43,与HRB中部分分测验相关均低,大多数相关系数在0.30以下。结论:CISYC与传统智力测验具有类似的功能,结构效度较理想。 Objective: To examine the validity of CISYC. Method: The internal consistency of the scale,factor analysis, and its correlation with other intelligence scales, reaction-time, and the Halstead-Retain Neuropsychological Battery (HRB) were examined. Results: Nearly all subtest mean scores on CISYC increased at successive ages. Both subscales (Verbal comprehension/Generalization and Space-cognition/Reasoning) had a relatively high internal consistency. Factor analysis showed that all subtests had moderate level load of g factor, and two factor model seemed most appropriate for the eight elementary subtests. The correlation coefficients between IQ of CISYC and FIQ of C-WYCSI, between Space-cognition/Generalization subscale score of CISYC and PIQ of C-WYCSI, and between verbal comprehension subscale score of CISYC and VIQ of C-WYCSI were 0.83, 0.73 and 0.72 respectively. CISYC also had high correlation (0.71) with mental processing composite of K-ABC; However, CISYC showed low correlation with reaction-time (-0.31~-0.47) and the HRB subtests (-0.27~0.42). Conclusion: CISYC had satisfactory construct validity.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSCD 1998年第2期76-80,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家八.五攻关项目
关键词 幼儿 智力量表 效度 编制 Young child, Intelligence scale, Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献3

共引文献14

同被引文献28

  • 1杜亚松,寇建华,王秀玲,夏黎明,邹如皓.长处和困难问卷研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(6):1419-1421. 被引量:82
  • 2Kendler KS, Myers J, Prescott CA. Sex differences in the relationship between social support and risk for major depression: a longitudinal study of opposite-sex twin pairs. Am J Psychiatry,2005, 162:250-256. 被引量:1
  • 3Baker LA, Barton M, Raine A, et al .The Southern California Twin Register at the University of Southern California. Twin Res, 2002, 5 : 456- 459. 被引量:1
  • 4Willemsen G, Boomsma DI. Religious upbringing and neuroticism in Dutch twin families. Twin Res Hum C, enet ,2007,10:327-333. 被引量:1
  • 5Jackson RW, Snieder H, Davis H, et al. Determination of twin zygosity: a comparison of DNA with various questionnaire indices. Twin Res ,2001, 4:12-18. 被引量:1
  • 6Goodman R. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note.J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 1997,38:581-586. 被引量:1
  • 7Goodman R, Ford T, Richards H, et al. The Development and Well-Being Assessment : description and initial validation of an integrated assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2000, 41:645-655. 被引量:1
  • 8McDevitt SC, Carey WB. The measurement of temperament in 3-7 year old children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 1978,19:245-253. 被引量:1
  • 9Fullard W, McDevitt SC, Carey WB, et al. Assessing temperament in oneto three-year-old children. J Pediatr Psychol, 1978, 9:205-217. 被引量:1
  • 10Phillips MR, West CL, Shen Q, et al. Comparison of schizophrenic patients' families and normal families in China, using Chinese versions of FACES-Ⅱ and the family environment scales. Family Process, 1998,37: 95-106. 被引量:1

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部