期刊文献+

经济学的当代反思及其启示——基于人类主体视角

A Contemporary Reflection and Implications of Economics:in the Human-as-Subject Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对经济学理论适时进行必要的反思始终是这门学科进步的一大动力。从人类主体视角来看,当代西方经济学存在假设狭隘、将人物化等缺陷,导致其对劳动者关注不足,在制定经济政策和调节社会矛盾方面有极大的阶级局限性。就其基本倾向而言,这是一种要物而不要人的经济学。而经典马克思注意政治经济学坚持从人类主体,特别是从普通劳动者立场看待社会经济发展,是人和物兼备的经济学理论。当前,马克思主义政治经济学研究应更加重视从人类自身发展,特别是从每个人自由而全面发展的角度来理解经济发展,实现经济发展和社会发展的统一。 One of the driving forces behind the progress of the discipline of economies is the necessary and timely reflection on economic theories. From the human-as-subject perspective, this paper argues, contemporary western economics is plagued with defects such as nan'ow hypotheses and materialization of humanity. It fails to give due attention to workers and suffers from serious class-based limitations in making economic policies and coordinating social contradictions. Looking into its essential disposition, it is easy to conclude that it is a type of economies focusing on materiality rather than humanity. By contrary, classical Marxist political economy insists on approaching socioeconomic development from the human-as-subject perspective and in particular from the standpoint of ordinary workers. Its theory takes into account both humanity and matcriality. It is argued that contemporary research on Marxist political economy should place more emphasis on the development of humanity, particularly the free and all- round development of each individual, in order to understand and guide economic development and ultimately unify economic development and social development.
作者 朱世陆
出处 《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第3期41-47,共7页 Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
基金 福建省社会科学规划项目“跨国公司在闽研发机构与本土互动的机制和模式研究”(2008B2079)
关键词 当代西方主流经济学 马克思主义政治经济学 人类主体经济学 minstream contemporary western economics, Marxist political economy, human-as-subject economics
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1阿马蒂亚·森.《伦理学与经济学》,北京:商务印书馆,2000. 被引量:11
  • 2阿马蒂亚·森.2002,《以自由看待发展》,北京:中国人民大学出版社. 被引量:28
  • 3莱博维奇.2007:《超越资本论-马克思的工人阶级政治经济学》,北京:经济科学出版社. 被引量:1
  • 4富布鲁克.2004:《经济学的危机:经济学改革国际运动最初600天》,北京:高等教育出版社. 被引量:1
  • 5高放.当今坚持并发展科学社会主义断想[J].马克思主义与现实,2008,60(3):15-17. 被引量:2
  • 6无.缓解收入差距扩大的阶段性目标及对策[J].经济学动态,2007(3):33-37. 被引量:5
  • 7格鲁曼著,徐节文等译.1985:《比较经济制度分析》,北京:中国社会出版社. 被引量:1
  • 8蒋自强,张旭昆著..三次革命和三次综合 西方经济学演化模式研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1996:591.
  • 9胡锦涛.2007:《高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜,为夺取全面建设小康社会新胜利而奋斗--在中国共产党第十七次全国代表大会上的报告》,北京:人民出版社. 被引量:2
  • 10胡培兆.2006:《经济学本质论-三论三别》,北京:经济科学出版社. 被引量:1

二级参考文献64

  • 1国家统计局农村社会经济调查司课题组.我国农村居民收入分配差距实证分析[J].调研世界,2006(3):3-6. 被引量:19
  • 2Cockshott W.Paul,Allin Cottrell(2003), "A note on the organic eomposifion of capital and profit rates". Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol.27, No.5. 被引量:1
  • 3Fleetwood,Steve(2001 ) ,"What kind of theory is Marx's labour theory of value? A critical realist inquiry". Capital & Class ,Vol.73 ,Spring. 被引量:1
  • 4Fleetwood,Steve(2001 ) ,"What kind of theory is Marx's labour theory of value? A critical realist inquiry". Capital & Class ,Vol.73 ,Spring. 被引量:1
  • 5Kliman,Andrew & Ted McGlone(1999) ,"A temporal single-system interpretation of Marx's value theory". Redav of Political Economy. Vol. 11,No. 1. 被引量:1
  • 6liman, Andrew J. (2008)Simultaneous valuation vs. the exploitation theory of profit : A sunning up. Online at http: / / mpra. ub. uni- muenchen. de/6891 / MPRA Paper No. 6891, posted 25. January 2008122 : 37. 被引量:1
  • 7Laibman, David (2001 ), Rising' Material' vs. failing ' Value' rates of profit: trial by simulation, Capital & Calss. Vol.73, No. 1. 被引量:1
  • 8Loranger,Jean-Guy(2004),"A profit-rate invariant solution to the Marxian la'ansformation problem", Capital & Class, Vol. 76, No. 1. ( Spring). 被引量:1
  • 9Muhan, Simon(2004), "The Australian rate of profit 1965 - 2001", Journal of Australian Political Economy, No 52. 被引量:1
  • 10Saad-Filho,Alfredo(1997), "An alternative reading of the transformation of value into prices of production", Capital & Class. London. Vol. 69, No. 3 (Autumn). 被引量:1

共引文献324

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部