摘要
目的对比全髋关节置换术后放置引流与否的结果是否对近期疗效有不同影响,为进一步康复方案的制定提供数据支持。方法随机抽取2007年在我院骨科初次全髋关节置换术后放置引流和不放置引流的两组病例各35髋,共纳入70髋。观察其手术时间、术后输红细胞量、术后下地时间、术后退热时间、术后拆线时间,比较放置引流和不放置引流两组以上指标是否有差异。结果两组患者术后输血、退热时间、下地时间、拆线时间等方面放置引流组和不放置引流组差异均无显著意义(P>0.05)。结论对于有选择的全髋关节置换病例,术后不放置引流组的出血及功能恢复方面同放置引流组没有明显差异。就全髋关节置换术后近期影响来说,不放置引流是可行的,对于长期结果是否有影响尚需进一步观察。
Objective To find out whether there would be different short term results of placed drainage after primary total hip arthroplasty （THA）. Method 35 patients after THA were selected and divided into two groups in this study, each group has 35 hips. The patients＇ clinical data was collected, such as duration of surgery, volume of postoperative transfusion, first mobile time after surgery, regression time of fever after surgery, time of sutures out, edema score of lower extremities. Then those data was analyzed by SPSS software. Result There was no signifi- cant difference on general condition between the drainage group and non-drainage group （P〉0.05）. There was also no significant difference between two groups on such aspects as volume of postoperative transfusion, first mobile time after surgery, regression time of fever after surgery, and time of sutures out. Conclusion There was no significant different blood loss or rehabilitation time between drainage group and non-drainage group. Non-drainage is possible after primary total hip arthroplasy. The long term result of non-drainage is still need to be studied.
出处
《护士进修杂志》
北大核心
2009年第4期295-296,共2页
Journal of Nurses Training
关键词
全髋关节置换
引流
康复
护理
Total hip arthroplasty
Drainage
Rehabilitation
Nursing
