期刊文献+

公共品供给、公平感与收入分配 被引量:13

Provision of Public Good,Perception of Fairness and Income Distribution
原文传递
导出
摘要 建立在资源未被充分利用基础之上的收入再分配政策,虽然一定程度上能实现公平,但不能改变已经发生的配置结果。增加公共品供给,能改善人力资本积累的机会,促进社会流动,增强风险承担能力,平抑社会不公平感,最终减少事后再分配的必要,兼顾了效率与公平。即使事后存在一定的收入差距,由于机会相对均等以及个人禀赋差异,从而人们在观念上更能够接受。与发达国家相对健全的市场机制相比较,中国的改革和发展应当为愿意承担风险的市场主体提供更多的激励。因此,事前的公共品供给是最小效率损失的政策选择,公共支出应更多地致力于公共品供给,使改革中的最少受惠者获得更多的市场机会,合理的公共支出结构将有利于进一步推进改革并实现长期公平发展。 In this paper, we discuss the redistribution policy from the perspective of provision of public goods and subjective fairness. In a framework that subjective equity is affected by social value, provi- sion of public goods and attitudes towards risk, the provision of public goods could have the same effect on enhancing fairness as income transfer, but with less incentive loss. Due to the fact that pub- lic goods provides an insurance in a situation of being poverty, it will make people more risk-bearing and thus helpful for economic growth. Moreover, public goods is a way to increase social mobility, it is more effective to solve the problem of Unfairness and intergenerational inequality than other income redistribution policies. Therefore, an appropriate public expenditure program with more public goods provision is needed to promote further reform and fulfill equitable development.
作者 张涛 伏玉林
出处 《学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第5期81-87,共7页 Academic Monthly
基金 教育部重大攻关项目"城乡统筹就业问题研究"(批准号:07JZD0023) 国家社科基金项目"税费改革后农村公共服务民营化的经济学实证考察"(批准号:08BJY133)阶段性研究成果
关键词 公共品供给 公平感 收入分配 provision of public goods, perception of fairness, income distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Arthur Okun (1975), Equality or Efficiency : The Big Tradeoff. The Brooking Institute, Washington, 1975. 被引量:1
  • 2OECD.《中国公共支出面临的挑战:通向更有效和公平之路》,北京,清华大学出版社,2006. 被引量:1
  • 3Lerner, Melvin J. , The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion: New York, NY: Plenum Press, 1982. 被引量:1
  • 4Ernst Fehr & Klaus M. Schmidt, 1999. "A Theory Of Fairness, Competition, And Cooperation", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 114(3), pages 817-868, August. 被引量:1
  • 5Alesina, A., E. Glaeser, and B. Sacerdote (2001), “Why Doesn't the United States Have a European-style Welfare State?” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2 : 2001. 被引量:1
  • 6Milton Friedman, 1953. "Choice, Chance, and the Personal Distribution of Income. Milton Friedman". The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 61, No. 4. (Aug., 1953), pp. 277-290. 被引量:1
  • 7F. Knight (1921), Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit, Boston: Houghton- Mifflin. 被引量:1
  • 8Alesina, A. , and E. Ira Ferrara (2003), "Preferences for Redistribution in the Land of Opportunities", Harvard University mimeo. 被引量:1
  • 9Stuart Butler, William Beach and Paul Winfree(2008). “Pathways to Economic Mobility: Key Indicators”, The Heritage Foundation. 被引量:1
  • 10罗伯特·霍尔(Robert hall),马可·利伯曼(Marc,Liberman).《经济学原理和应用》(第二版),北京,中信出版社,2003. 被引量:1

同被引文献252

引证文献13

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部