摘要
龚自珍经学的评价问题一直是龚自珍思想研究中存在较多分歧的方面。评价的可信性必须以其准确的定位为前提,而梁启超、章太炎、钱穆及今人对龚自珍经学的定位都不够准确。其绝不是人们"公认"的今文经学,应将龚自珍经学与其整个思想相区分,并将其经学分为思想与学问两大内容,才可以对龚自珍经学的特色与价值作出正确的评判。
There are many differences in how to evaluate Gong Zizhen＇ s Confucian Classics. This paper thinks that a accurate allocation is the premise of credibility of evaluation . But Hang Qichao, Zhang Taiyan, Qian Mu and many contemporaries did not check right accurate allocation about it. Take an overlook on Gong Zizhen＇s Confucian Classics, we will find that his studies never are the New Text School as universally accepted. We ought to distinguish between his study of Confucian classics and his entire thoughts, and have the ability to compartmentalize it as two parts： thought and knowledge, that we can make a correct deciding to the characteristic and value of Gong Zizhen＇s Confucian Classics.
出处
《河北学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第3期39-42,共4页
Hebei Academic Journal
基金
2007年度国家哲学社会科学基金项目《公羊学发展史》(编号:07BZX033)
关键词
龚自珍
经学
评价
Gong Zizhen
Confucian Classics
Evaluation
