摘要
劳动力流动伴随着发展中国家工业化和城市化进程不断推进,虽然中国的劳动力流动受市场和制度的约束有其自身的特点,但就整体流动进程而言经典劳动力流动理论仍具有指导意义。不同劳动力流动理论在理论依据、基本假设、流动模型及动力来源等方面不同,通过比较分析,结合中国劳动流动的实践,研究得出中国目前劳动力流动尚未到达刘易斯转折点的结论,并提出推进中国劳动力流动的动力应是多元化的,城乡分割的户籍制度和教育制度以及现行的土地流动制度已经成为制约劳动力流动的瓶颈。
With the process of the developing countries＇ industrialization and urbanization, the circumstance of labor force flowing has been developing. Although China＇s labor force flowing is bound by market and system and has its own characteristics, as far as the monolithic flowing process is concerned, the classical labor force flowing theory is still meaningful. Each labor force flowing theory is different at many aspects, such as theoretical basis, basic presumption, and the source of power. Through comparing and analyzing, together with practice, we get the conclusion that China＇s present labor force flowing has not arrived at Lewis turning point yet, and put forward that the power pushing labor flowing should be pluralistic, but the domiciliary system, the education system and the present land transfer system have been the bottlenecks of labor force flowing.
出处
《西北农林科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2009年第3期60-65,共6页
Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition)
关键词
劳动力流动
二元经济结构
刘易斯转折点
labor force flowing
dual economic structure
Lewis turning point
