期刊文献+

RECIST标准评价食管癌新辅助化疗疗效的可行性研究 被引量:5

Feasibility study on evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic response of esophageal cancer with RECIST criteria
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨运用REC IST标准评价食管癌新辅助化疗疗效的可行性。方法选择新辅助化疗食管癌患者。根据食管钡餐X线片显示病变长度,将食管病灶分为T1、T2、T3、T4期,CT扫描确定N、M分期。FLP方案化疗2个周期后,按照REC IST标准评价食管癌化疗疗效。结果68例患者中,Tl、T2、T3、T4期分别为2、31、24、11例,N0、N1期分别为12、56例。临床分期Ⅲ、Ⅳa及Ⅳb期分别为25、20、23例。化疗2个周期后评价疗效,CR 1例,PR 27例,SD 30例,PD 10例,RR为41%。结论RE-C IST标准能够评价食管癌新辅助化疗疗效,食管钡餐X线片显示病灶长度确定食管癌T分期,更适用于临床应用。 Aim To assess the feasibility of the response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal cancer with RECIST criteria. Methods The esophageal cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were selected. According to barium meal X -ray film,the primary lesion lengths in esophagus were divided into T1 ,T2 ,T3 and T4. The N and M stage was determined by CT scan. The response was evaluated according to RECIST criteria after 2 cycles of chemotherapy of FLP regimen. Results There were 2 cases for T1,31 cases for T2,24 cases for T3 and 11 cases for T4 and 12 for N0,56 for N1 among the 68 cases of patients. In clinical stage,there were 25 cases for 111,20 eases for IVa and 23 cases for IVb. The response was evaluated after 2 cycles of chemotherapy. There were CR 1 case, PR 27 cases, SD 30 cases and PD 10 cases. The RR was 41%. Conclusions The response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal cancer could be assessed with RE- CIST criteria. The T stage of esophageal cancer according to barium meal X-ray film is more convenient for the clinical application.
出处 《安徽医药》 CAS 2009年第5期521-523,共3页 Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
基金 安徽省自然科学基金重点项目(No05021002)
关键词 食管癌 临床分期 RECIST 新辅助化疗 esophageal cancer RECIST clinical stage neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献37

共引文献171

同被引文献53

  • 1钱正子,王华庆,张熙曾.食管癌新辅助化疗研究进展[J].国外医学(肿瘤学分册),2005,32(10):772-775. 被引量:5
  • 2林丽珠,陶志广,周岱翰.WHO标准和RECIST在肺癌多中心疗效评价的比较[J].中国肿瘤临床,2006,33(5):253-255. 被引量:41
  • 3Eisenhauer EA,Therasse P,Bogaerts J,et al.New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours:revised RECIST guideline(version 1.1)[J].Eur J Cancer,2009,45(2):228-247. 被引量:1
  • 4Burmeister BH,Smithers BM,Gebski V,et al.Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus:a randomised controlled phase Ⅲ trial[J].Lancet Oncol,2005,6(9):659-668. 被引量:1
  • 5Grivennikov SI,Greten FR,Karin M.Immunity,inflammation,and cancer[J].Cell,2010,140(6):883-899. 被引量:1
  • 6Batlivala SP.Focus on diagnosis:the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and the C-reactive protein test[J].Pediatr Rev,2009,30(2):72-74. 被引量:1
  • 7World Health Organization (WHO). WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization, 1979. 被引量:1
  • 8Duffaud F, Therasse P. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. Bull Cancer, 2000, 87(12): 881-886. 被引量:1
  • 9Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer, 2009, 45(2): 228-247. 被引量:1
  • 10James K, Eisenhauer E, Christian M, et al. Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1999, 91(6): 523-528. 被引量:1

引证文献5

二级引证文献101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部