摘要
罗常培指出,早在五代时期精、见二系就开始合流,但后来的研究对罗的观点均持否定态度。对敦煌诗中的别字异文作穷尽的考察,可以发现二系合流有八例。五代后敦煌等西北地区丧失了中西文化交流的出入口的功能,从而导致历史文献的断层,这应是二系合流未见文献证据的原因之所在。
Luo Changpei once pointed out that the two so-called Jing and Jian groups （two groups of different initial consonants） began to converge as early as the Five Dynasties （907-960 A.D.）. But all of the researches by later scholars have refuted this argument. Based on an examination of the incorrect characters and different forms of the same word discovered in the poems in Dunhuang Fresco, it could be found that there are eight evidences of such convergence. After the five dynasties period, Dunhuang and other northwest district of China gradually lost their historical position as a communication bridge between China and the West, which directly led to the absence of the historical documents on the convergence in northwestern China. And this must be the reason why no documental evidence existed after the convergence.
出处
《温州大学学报（社会科学版）》
2009年第3期55-59,共5页
Journal of Wenzhou University：Social Science Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金(05BYY053)
中国博士后科学基金(20070410403)
关键词
敦煌诗
别字
异文
精系
见系
合流
Poems in Dunhuang Fresco
Incorrect characters
Different forms of the same word
Jing group
Jian group
Convergence
