期刊文献+

逻辑课程学习对演绎推理中信念偏差效应的影响 被引量:2

On the Impact of Logical Study upon the Belief Disparity in Deductive Reasoning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用结论评估的推理实验范式,以大学生为被试考察了逻辑课程学习对信念偏差效应的影响。研究结果初步表明,无论是时间推理问题还是三段论推理问题,逻辑课程学习对学生的逻辑推理成绩没有显著影响,也没有改变学生在推理中信念偏差效应的强度与表现模式。从本研究结果来看,信念偏差效应不仅与被试的逻辑推理能力有关,被试抑制无关信念的执行控制能力也是影响信念偏差效应的重要因素。 The article, based on the inference paradigm of conclusion assessment, attempts to consider the impact of logical study on belief disparity in deductive reasoning by sampling subjects of college students. The results indicate that logical study of temporal inference and syllogism exerts no influence on students' deduction and no changes in intensity and models of belief disparity in reasoning. It also shows that belief bias is closely related to subjects' capacity in logical inference and of controlling irrelevant belief effects.
作者 姚志强
出处 《宁波大学学报(教育科学版)》 2009年第2期46-51,共6页 Journal of Ningbo University(Educational Science Edition)
关键词 演绎推理 逻辑有效性 信念偏差效应 deductive reasoning logical effectiveness belief bias
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1EVANS J ST B T, NEWSTEAD S E, BYRNE R M J. Human reasoning: the psychology of deduction[M]. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd, 1993: 5-12. 被引量:1
  • 2胡竹菁.演绎推理心理学的研究[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2000:46-59. 被引量:1
  • 3WILKINS M C. The effect of changed material on the ability to do formal syllogistic reasoning[J]. Archives of Psychology, 1928, 16(102). 被引量:1
  • 4EVANS J ST B T, BARSTON J L, POPPARD P. On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning[J]. Memory and Cognition. 1983, 11: 295~306. 被引量:1
  • 5CHENG P W, HOLYOAK K J, NISBETT R E, et al. Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning[J]. Cognitive Psychology, 1986, 18: 293-328. 被引量:1
  • 6NEWSTEAD S E, POLLARD P, EVANS J St B T, etal. The source of belief bias in syllogistic reasoning[J]. Cognition.1992, 45: 257-284. 被引量:1
  • 7EVANS J ST B T, NEWSTEAD S E, ALLEN J L, et al. Debiasing by instruction--the case of belief bias[J]. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1994 ( 6): 263-285. 被引量:1
  • 8BEREITER C, SCARDAMALIA M. Cognitive coping strategies and the problem of "inert" knowledge[M]//CHIPMAN S, SEGAL J W, GLASER R. Thinking and learning skills: current research and open question. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1985 : 65-80. 被引量:1
  • 9MOSHMAN D. The development of metalogical understanding[M]//OVERTON W F. Reasoning, necessity, and logic: developmental perspectives. Hillsdale, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum associates, 1990: 205-266. 被引量:1
  • 10HOUDE O. Inhibition and cognitive development: object, number, categorization, and reasoning[J]. Cognitive Development, 2000, 15: 63-73. 被引量:1

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部