期刊文献+

不同主题和风险下的人际信任:“信任圈”的中、加比较 被引量:17

Interpersonal Trust for Different Domains and Risk Levels:Comparing the Trust Circle of Chinese and Canadians
原文传递
导出
摘要 在人际关系网络中,那些被信任者构成了个体的"信任圈",信任圈的规模可以代表个体表现出的信任水平。本研究考察了在不同交流主题(借钱、正面和负面信息交流)和风险等级下,中国人和加拿大人信任圈规模的差异。对202名中国和加拿大成年被试的调查表明,交流主题对信任水平有影响,在借钱和交流正面信息时信任圈明显大于交流负面信息时;风险等级越高,信任圈越小,在借钱时人们对风险等级尤其敏感;无论分享正面还是负面信息时,中国人的信任圈都比加拿大人更小,而在借钱方面中国人比加拿大人的信任圈更大。可见,人际信任与主题、风险和文化因素及其交互作用有关,这些结果对于理解信任的文化差异和跨文化交往实践非常有意义。 In everyday life, varied economic and information exchanges frequently occur between one and another, a primary condition of which is both parities trusting each other. In the study, a new construct named as "trust circle" was developed and the size of the circle was used as an index of one' s interpersonal trust level. The purpose of the study was to explore how the size of one' s trust circle is affected by the trust domain, risk level and culture in China and Canada. An questionnaire was administrated to 100 Chinese residents in China (mean age 32.92) and 102 Canadians (mean age 31.94) who participated in the study voluntarily. The results showed that: (1) the average trust circle size in different domains differs, specifically, the size of the trust circle in the economic situation is the largest, the size is the smallest in the negative information sharing context and it is in the middle in the positive personal/social information sharing context; (2) the trust circle size varies with risk level; as the economic risk increases the trust circle becomes smaller, as the degree of the shared positive information increases the trust circle becomes larger, and as the degree of the shared negative information increases the trust circle becomes smaller; (3) the trust circle sizes in different cultures are not the same, for example, trust circle size of Chinese participants is larger than Canadians' in the economic risk situation, and Canadians' trust circle sizes are larger than Chinese counterparts' in both positive and negative personal/ social information sharing domains. Thus, it can be concluded that whether people trust others is affected by the related domain, the risk level, the culture and interactions of two "or three factors. Aforementioned results are heuristic for clarifying culture differences of interpersonal trust and for promoting cress-culture communication of people from China and Canada.
出处 《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期61-67,共7页 Psychological Development and Education
基金 北京师范大学创新研究群体发展计划资助
关键词 人际信任 信任圈 风险 主题 跨文化研究 interpersonal trust trust circle risk i domain cross-culture research
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Yamaglshi T, Yamagishi M. Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 1994, 18: 129-166. 被引量:1
  • 2Rousseau D M, Sitkin S B, Burr R S, Camerer C. Not so different after at1: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23 : 393 - 404. 被引量:1
  • 3Lane C. Introduction: Theories and issue in the study of trust. In: C Lane, R Bachmann (Eds.) Trust within and between organizations (pp. 1 -30). New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. 被引量:1
  • 4Williamson O E. Calculativeness, trust and economic organization. Journal of Law and Economics, 1993, 30:131 - 145. 被引量:1
  • 5Weber M. The religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism. New York: The Free Press, 1951. 被引量:1
  • 6张建新,MichaelH.Bond.指向具体人物对象的人际信任:跨文化比较及其认知模型[J].心理学报,1993,25(2):164-172. 被引量:57
  • 7张建新.殊化信任与泛化信任在人际信任行为路径模型中的作用[J].心理学报,2000,32(3):312-312. 被引量:35
  • 8费孝通著..乡土中国 生育制度[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1998:347.
  • 9Hardin R. Trust. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006. 被引量:1
  • 10Niu Jianghe. Circles of trust: A comparison of the size and composition of trust circles in Canada and in China. Doctoral dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada, 2007. 被引量:1

二级参考文献49

  • 1宋维真.中国人使用明尼苏达多相个性测验表的结果分析[J].心理学报,1985,17(4):346-355. 被引量:96
  • 2陈仲庚.艾森克人格问卷的项目分析[J].心理学报,1983,15(2):211-218. 被引量:381
  • 3宋维真,张建新,张建平,张妙清,梁觉.编制中国人个性测量表(CPAI)的意义与程序[J].心理学报,1993,25(4):400-407. 被引量:52
  • 4黄希庭 张蜀林.562个人格特质形容词的好恶度、意义度和熟悉度的测定[A]..见:黄希庭心理学文选[C].重庆:西南师范大学出版社,2000.283-311. 被引量:4
  • 5周明洁,张建新.中国人的人际关系性研究.2006(评审中) 被引量:1
  • 6Cattell R B. Personality structure and the new fifth edition of the 16PF. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 1995, 55:926-937 被引量:1
  • 7Costa P T, McCrae R R. Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 54:853-863 被引量:1
  • 8Kerry L Jang, et al. Heritability of Facet-Level Traits in a Cross-Cultural Twin Sample,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998, 74:1556 被引量:1
  • 9Cloninger C R. A unified biosocial theory of personality and its role in the development of anxiety states. Psychiatry Developments, 1986, 3:167-226 被引量:1
  • 10Stough C, et al. Psychophysiological correlates of the NEOPI-R openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness:preliminary results, Int J Psychophysiol, 2001, 41(1): 87-91 被引量:1

共引文献272

同被引文献263

引证文献17

二级引证文献108

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部