摘要
目的:对比阑尾炎不同手术方法术后的观察及护理。方法:选择165例阑尾炎患者并分为两组:腹腔镜下阑尾切除术组(微创组)87例,传统阑尾切除术组(传统组)78例,采用对照研究方法,用数字式评估工具对165例患者的术后情况及护理进行对比。结果:两组患者的切口疼痛程度、胃肠功能恢复时间、术后并发症和住院天数比较,差异有显著性(P<0.05);住院费用比较,差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论:微创组患者痛苦小、术后恢复快、并发症少,且腹壁美观,护理相对简单,节省人力,明显优于传统组。
Objective： To compare the observation and nursing of appendicitis after operated on in different surgical ways. Methods： 165 cases of patients with appendicitis were selected and divided into two groups： laparoscopic appendectomy group （minimally invasive group）, 87 cases; and traditional appendectomy group （traditional group）, 78 cases. Control study methods and digital assessment tools were applied to compare 165 patients＇ situation and nursing after operation. Results： The degree of surgical incision pain, gastrointestinal function recovery time, postoperative complications and the days of hospital stay of two groups showed significant differences （P〈0.05）, and the hospitalization expenses between two groups showed no difference （P〉0.05）. Conclusion： Patients in minimally invasive group have little pain, rapid recovery after operation, fewer complications and beautiful abdominal wall compared with traditional group. Their nursing is relatively simple, and could save labor, so it is much better than traditional group.
出处
《中国医药导报》
CAS
2009年第13期14-15,共2页
China Medical Herald
关键词
阑尾炎
腹腔镜
护理
Appendicitis
Laparoseope
Nursing
