期刊文献+

腹膜细胞刷检在恶性腹水中的诊断价值 被引量:7

The significance of peritoneal brush cytology in the diagnosis of malignant ascites
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价腹膜细胞刷刷检在良、恶性腹水鉴别诊断中的应用价值。方法:用自制腹膜细胞刷对28例有中等量以上恶性腹水患者作腹膜刷检,并与腹水常规脱落细胞学检查、腹膜活检等方法进行比较。结果:腹水常规脱落细胞学检查肿瘤细胞的阳性率为42.9%,腹膜病理活检46.4%,腹膜刷检82.1%;腹膜活检后腹水脱落细胞学检查肿瘤细胞的阳性率为64.3%,腹膜刷检后85.7%;腹膜活检和腹膜刷检同时进行后腹水脱落细胞学检查肿瘤细胞的阳性率增加至96.4%。结论:腹膜刷检可提高良、恶性腹水的诊断正确率,是一种操作方便、安全有效的检查手段。 Objective: To identify applied value of peritoneal brush cytology in the diagnosis of benign and malignant ascites. Methods: Peritoneal brush cytology was performed with brush made by ourselves in 28 patients with malignant ascites, as compared with biopsy and routine cytology analysis in ascitic fluid specimen. Results: The positive rate of malignant cells in ascites was 42.9% by routine cytology; that was 46.4% with biopsy; that was 82.1% with brush cytology. The positive rate of malignant cells in ascitic fluid specimen was 64.3% and 85.7% after biopsy and after brush cytology, respectively.The positive rate of malignant cells in ascitic fluid specimen was 96.4% after biopsy together with brush cytology. Conclusion: The peritoneal brush cytology is a convenient,safe and effective method and can increase accuracy in the diagnosis of benign and malignant ascites.
出处 《第二军医大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 1998年第2期182-183,共2页 Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University
关键词 恶性 腹水 腹膜细胞刷检 诊断 malignant ascites peritoneal brush cytology peritoneal exfoliating cytology peritoneal biopsy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献2

共引文献7

同被引文献21

  • 1杨雪玲,林三仁,李成刚,王文洁.良恶性腹水CA19-9CEA检测及临床意义[J].北京医科大学学报,1995,27(1):71-71. 被引量:5
  • 2安子元,徐大毅,安照源.腹膜活检的方法及诊断价值(附302例腹膜疾病分析)[J].中国实用内科杂志,1996,16(1):35-36. 被引量:14
  • 3叶胜龙 刘泽民 等.血清甘氨酰脯氨酸二肽氨基肽酶对原发性肝癌的诊断价值[J].中华医学杂志,1987,67(3):134-134. 被引量:7
  • 4Volckmann ET, Hungness ES, Soper N J, et al. Surgeon perceptions of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). J Gastrointest Surg,2009,13 : 1401-1410. 被引量:1
  • 5Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, et al. NOTES: transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy in humans-preliminary report of a case series. Am J Gastroenterol,2009,104:843-837. 被引量:1
  • 6Auyang ED, Hungness ES, Vaziri K, et al. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. ( NOTES ) : dissection for the critical view of safety during transcolonic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc, 2009, 23:1117-1118. 被引量:1
  • 7Sugimoto M, Yasuda H, Koda K, et al. Evaluation for transvaginat and transgastric NOTES cholecystectomy in human and animal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg,2009, 16: 255-260. 被引量:1
  • 8Voermans RP, Sheppard B, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Comparison of Transgastric NOTES and laparoscopic peritoneoscopy for detection of peritoneal metastases. Ann Surg, 2009,250(2):255-259. 被引量:1
  • 9Zhang M, Jiang X, Zhang M, et al. The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CTin the evaluation of Ascites of Undetermined Origin. J Nucl Med, 2009,50 (4) : 506-512. 被引量:1
  • 10Dray X, Marteau P. The future of gastrointestinal therapeutic endoscopy: NOTES. Gastroenterol Clin Biol, 2009,33 (8-9): 758-766. 被引量:1

引证文献7

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部