摘要
理论找矿、还是经验找矿？是西方矿产勘查家普遍关注并引起人们争论的一个问题。以美国Ｄ．Ｇ．里奇为代表的一派认为：成矿理论，虽然能使地质学家了解到成矿作用过程的许多情况，但并不能指导未知矿床的找矿工作。这一观点立即遭到Ｊ．罗思及前苏联一些地质学家的反对，批评Ｄ．Ｇ．里奇等人倾向于轻视概念模式（即理论模式）在找矿中的意义。指出，只有全面研究具体的矿石建造成因问题，才能确定相应矿床形成的地点和时间，进而才能制定矿床预测、普查和勘探的科学基础。
The problems of prospecting by theory or by empiricism,have attracted the common attention of the Western explorers and have arrested geologists' argument.The representative group as D.G.Ridge of U.S think that, mineralization theory couldn't guide prospecting for unknown mineralization,though it gave geologists an understanding of processes of mineralization .This viewpoint had been subjected to be opposed immediately by J.Rose and geologists from former Soviet Union .They criticized D.G.Ridge and so on to tend to underestimate the mean of concept mode(i.e.theory mode ) in prospecting ,and pointed that,it was only through thoroughly studying the origin of concrete ore formation,we can determine the site and the time of formation of relevant ore deposits and then work out the scientific approches of prognosis,reconnaissance and exploration of mineral deposits.
出处
《吉林地质》
1998年第1期94-96,共3页
Jilin Geology
