期刊文献+

蠕变—疲劳交互作用下结构缺陷评定方法的比较 被引量:2

COMPARISONS OF DIFFERENT DEFECT ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES FOR DEFECTED STRUCTURES UNDER CREEP-FATIGUE LOADINGS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 电力装备以及石化设备的工作温度和压力呈现出日益增长的趋势,蠕变以及蠕变—疲劳交互作用成为高温设备失效的主要机制之一。文中介绍国际上几部主要缺陷评定标准,R5、BS7910、RCC-MR规程、日本JNC方法以及我国高温缺陷评定方法的最新进展,基于工程应用案例分析,比较不同规程缺陷评定方法的优劣,分析结果显示R5规程更符合实验结果,最后对进一步完善我国缺陷评定规范提出一些意见。 With the temperature and pressure increasing of power plants and petrochemical reactors, creep and creep-fatigue interaction become the main mechanisms of the failure in high temperature structures. In the present work, the recent developments of defect assessment concerning creep-fatigue interaction for structural integrity'described by RS, BS7910, RCC-MR code and Japanese JNC method are reviewed. The state-of-the-art of high temperature defect assessment technique in China is also presented. Based on engi- neering applications, the comparisons are carried out among the existing defect assessment methods. The results indicate that different extent of conservativeness occurs in the existing procedures. Comparatively, R5 leads to a good agreement with the experimental results. Finally, some suggestions are provided to improve the high temperature defect assessment method in China.
出处 《机械强度》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第2期269-275,共7页 Journal of Mechanical Strength
基金 国家高技术研究发展专项经费资助(2006AA04Z413)项目 教育部新世纪优秀人才计划(NCET-06-0414)项目~~
关键词 蠕变-疲劳 缺陷 缺陷评定 Creep-fatigue interaction Defects Defect assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Saxena A. Fracture mechanics approaches for characterizing creep-fatigue crack growth[J]. JSME Int. Journal, Series A, 1993, 36(1): 1-20. 被引量:1
  • 2British Energy Generation Ltd. R5 Assessment procedure for the high temperature response of structure[ S ]. UK: British Energy Generation Lid, Revision, 2003: 230-244. 被引量:1
  • 3British Standards Institution. BS 7910---99 Guide on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures: Incorporating Amendment No. 1 [ S ]. London: British Standards Institution, 2000: 1 - 196. 被引量:1
  • 4Association des. femmes commereantes et. entrepreneurs du Niger(AF- CEN). RCC-MR Design and construction rules for mechanical components of FBR nuclear islands[ S]. Paris: Association des. femmes commercantes et. entrepreneurs du Niger(AFCEN), 2002: 20-156. 被引量:1
  • 5Wakai T, Poussard C, Drubay B. A comparison between Japanese and French A16 defect assessment procedures for creep-fatigue crack growth [ J ]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2003, 224 (3) : 245-252. 被引量:1
  • 6国家质量技术监督局.GB/T1%24--2004在役含缺陷压力容器安全评定[s].北京:国家质量技术监督局,2005:1-56. 被引量:1
  • 7轩福贞,涂善东,王正东.基于TDFAD的高温缺陷"三级"评定方法[J].中国电机工程学报,2004,24(12):222-226. 被引量:7
  • 8轩福贞,涂善东,王正东.含裂纹结构时间相关的疲劳断裂理论与剩余寿命评价技术[J].力学进展,2005,35(3):391-403. 被引量:16
  • 9Wiesner C S, Maddox S J, Xu W, et al. Engineering critical analyses to BS7910- the UK guide on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures [ J ]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2000, 77(14): 883-893. 被引量:1
  • 10Moulin D, Drubay B, Laiarinandrasana L. A synthesis of the fracture assessrnent methods proposed in the French RCC-MR code for high temperature[J]. WRC Bulletin440, 1999: 1-107. 被引量:1

二级参考文献64

  • 1XuanFuzhen TuShandong WangZhengdong.TDFAD APPROACH TO HIGH TEMPERATURE DEFECT ASSESSMENT AND ITS ENGINEERING APPLICATION[J].Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2004,17(4):537-542. 被引量:4
  • 2涂善东,戴树和.高温过程设备的寿命评价技术进展[J].压力容器,1996,13(2):151-158. 被引量:17
  • 3[1]R5. Assessment procedure for the high temperature response of structures. Procedure R5, Issue 2. Gloucester, UK: Nuclear Electric Ltd, 1997 被引量:1
  • 4[2]Drubay B, Moulin D, Faidy C, et al. Defect assessment procedure: a French approach. ASME PVP, 1993, 266: 113~118 被引量:1
  • 5[3]BS 7910: 1999. Guide to methods of assessing the acceptability of flaws in fusion welded structures. London: BSI, 1999 被引量:1
  • 6[4]Ewald J, Sheng S, Klenk A, et al. Engineering guide to assessment of creep crack initiation on components by two-criteria-diagram. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2001, 78(11, 12): 937~949 被引量:1
  • 7[5]Dowling A R. Townley C A. The effect of defects on structural failure: a two-criteria approach. Int. J. Pres. Ves. and Piping, 1975, 3(1): 77~107 被引量:1
  • 8[6]R6. Assessment of the integrity of structures containing defects. Procedure R6-Revision 4. Gloucester, UK: Nuclear Electric Ltd., 2000 被引量:1
  • 9[7]Ainsworth R A, Hooton D G, Green G. Failure assessment diagrams for high temperature defect assessment. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1999, 62(1): 95~109 被引量:1
  • 10[8]Hooton D G, Green D, Ainsworth R A. An R6 type approach for the assessment of creep crack growth initiation in 316L stainless steel test specimens. ASME PVP Conference, Minneapolis, 1994, 287: 129~136 被引量:1

共引文献24

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部