摘要
分析罗杰斯的"非指导"与老子的"无为"这两个概念的同异。首先,"非指导"要求悬置自己的价值观;而"无为"则要求否定具有价值观。其次,"非指导"要求悬置自我进入他人,而"无为"则要求消除自我进入自然。再次,"非指导"是从关系到个人再回到关系,"无为"则是从个人到关系再回到个人。
The topic of this study is analyzing the homology and discrepancy between the ＂non-directive therapy＂ and ＂inaction thought＂. Firstly, ＂non-directive therapy＂ calls for suspense one＇s values, and the ＂Inaction thought＂ calls for denying the existence of values. Secondly, the former needs absolutely understanding others; but the latter needs absolutely in- tegrating into nature. Finally, the former＇s procedure is from ＂relation＂ to ＂individual＂ and then to ＂relation＂; but the latter＇s procedure is from ＂individual＂ to ＂relation＂ and then to ＂individual＂.
出处
《医学与哲学（A）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第4期39-41,共3页
Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition
关键词
非指导疗法
无为思想
共通性
non-directive therapy, inaction thought, coherence
