摘要
文章以许霆案为切入点,首先从法律规范层面认为法院对许霆行为的定性或可商榷,然后将关注的焦点定格到许霆案中反映出来的司法与人情的冲突上,并结合我国目前司法实践中存在的大量司法判决与民意断裂的现象,认为出现这种断裂的原因在于我国的法律制度设计未能将人情纳入到制度化的轨道。在借鉴普通法系国家的陪审制度经验的基础之上提出了完善我国人民陪审员制度的建议,以弥合法律与人情之间的裂痕。
This article proposes that Xuting＇s conduct did not constitute a crime,then the focus of attention fixes to the conflict betreen legal principles and human sentiment. The article holds the reason that Chinese legal system can not be integrates public opinions to the legalization track. The author puts forward that China＇s jury system should be improved on the basis of the experience of other countries＇ jury system and finally to close the fissure between Legal principles and human sentiment will be closed.
出处
《太原理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2009年第1期25-28,32,共5页
Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金
云南财经大学校级课题"制度之礼与王权的合法性建构"(8002509214)
关键词
罪
法理
人情
crime
legal principles
human sentiment
