摘要
《零售商供应商公平交易管理办法》颁布以来,超市通道费纠纷案件数量增多。审理的焦点是超市公司所主张的抵扣费用是否合法、金额是否合理。在司法实践中,人们对于有些问题的看法不尽一致。本文通过诉讼案件实证分析,对超市通道费纠纷案件审理中如何认定滚动结算与诉讼时效、抵销的效力及异议期限、超市通道费是否违反法律强制性规范等事实认定和法律适用问题作了一些探讨。
Since the promulgation of ‘The administrative rule on the fair dealing relationship between retailers and suppliers＇, cases of the slotting allowances and fees have been mounting. During the hearing the focus is the legality of deductions alleged by the supermarket and reasonableness of the amount of money. In fact there indeed exist different opinions and thoughts in legal practice. Based on an empirical analysis of cases, this paper analyzed the cognizance for settlement ways and time limitation, as well as the validity of contra account and objection period. Furthermore, it explores whether the slotting allowances and fees violated the compulsory legislations and the relevant issues as to the facts determination and law application.
出处
《上海商学院学报》
2009年第2期70-73,共4页
Business Economic Review
关键词
法律
零售关系
超市通道费
法律适用
law, relationship between retailer-supplier, slotting allowances and fees, law application
