期刊文献+

宏观金融效率、所有权效应与中国的银行自由化 被引量:1

Macro Financial efficiency,Ownership Effect and Liberalization of Banks in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 宏观金融效率主要表现为对宏观投资效率与配置效率的促进。出于弥补市场失灵等的考虑,许多国家安排了国有银行这一制度。关于宏观金融(银行)效率的所有权效应问题,存在发展观和政治观两种相反观点。基于中国银行自由化的现实背景,对银行所有权效率问题进行了计量检验。结果表明,国家所有权对中国宏观金融效率的影响均为正,但系数较小;银行国有化程度与金融效率之间存在反向关系;国有银行总体符合发展观点,但它也不利于信贷资本的高效使用和最优配置。 The macro financial efficiency mainly manifests itself in the promotion the macro investment efficiency and the allocation efficiency. Based on the consideration for making up the market failure etc. , many countries have established the system of the government bank. As for the issue of the ownership effect of the macro financial (bank) efficiency, there are two opposite viewpoints - the development outlook and political outlook. At the actual background of the liberalization of the govemment banks in China, we have made a measurement inspection of the ownership efficiency issue of the bank. The results show that the government banks have a positive effect on the macro financial efficiency of China, but the coefficient is rather small. There is an opposite relation between the degree of the liberalization of banks and the financial efficiency. As a whole, the government banks are not conducive to the high-efficiency utilization and optimal allocation of the loan capital while they conform to the development viewpoints.
出处 《西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期6-10,23,共6页 Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University:Social Sciences
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(06JC790016)
关键词 宏观金融效率 所有权效应 银行自由化 macro financial efficiency ownership effect liberalization of banks
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1[美]麦金农.经济自由化的顺序——向市场经济过渡中的金融控制[M]//麦金农经济学文集:第三卷.北京:中国金融出版社,2006. 被引量:1
  • 2Bodie R C, Merton R. The Design of Financial Systems:Towards a Synthesis of Function and Structure [ R ]. NBER Working Paper No. 10620, 2004. 被引量:1
  • 3王广谦著..经济发展中金融的贡献与效率[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997:238.
  • 4Bagehot W, Lombard S. A Description of the Money Market [M]. London: Kegan Paul, 1873. 被引量:1
  • 5Davis L E, Robert H. The Political Economy of British Imperialism : Measures of Benefits and Support [ J ]. The Journal of Economic History, 1982,43 : 110 - 130. 被引量:1
  • 6King R, Levine R. Financial and Growth : Schumpeter Might Be Righ[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1993, 108:717-737. 被引量:1
  • 7Boyd J H, Prescott E C. Financiallntermediary-Coalitions [ J ]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1986,38:211 - 232. 被引量:1
  • 8Gerschenkron A. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective[M]. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1962. 被引量:1
  • 9Myrdal G. Asian Drama[ M]. New York: Pantheon,1968. 被引量:1
  • 10Clarke C R, George R G. Bank Privatization in Argentina: A Model of Political Constraints and Differential Outcomes [ R ]. World Bank policy Research Working Paper No. 2633, 2001. 被引量:1

二级参考文献45

共引文献394

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部