期刊文献+

欧当归不可代替中药当归药用 被引量:9

The European angelica can not replace the Chinese angelica in medicinal application
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:寻找当归(Radix Angelicae Sinensis)与欧当归(Radix Levistic Officinalis)的鉴别方法。方法:利用宏观(药材性状)和微观(显微鉴别)手段,找出两者的差别。结果:当归药材单个根头,主根表面有明显横纹;横切面木质部黄白色,质地致密,通常无裂隙;气香,味甘、微辛。欧当归没有这些特征,其有数个茎的痕迹,主根表面无横纹;横断面木质部黄色,质地疏松,通常有明显裂隙;香气特殊,味辛辣、微甘。结论:由于欧当归气味及功效与当归不同,两者不能互相代替药用。使用本文所述方法,可以区分这两个品种。 Objective: To look for a method to identify Chinese angelica (Radix Angelicae Sinensis) and the European angelica (Radix Levistic Officinalis). Methods: Macro-(medicinal traits) and micro-(microseopic identification) methods were used to i- dentify differences between Chinese angelica and European angelica. Results: Angelica sinensis root was single head, main root surface had obvious cross striations; cross-sectional xylem yellowish-white, dense texture, usually no fracture; fra- grance, tased sweet, micro sim. The European angelica had no these characteristics, it had a number traces of stems, which root surface without cross striations; cross-sectional xylem yellow, loose texture, usually had fracture; the special aroma and tasted spicy, micro sweet. Conclusion: Because of the European angelica smell and effectiveness of special, the two vari- etios can not replace each other in medicinal application. Using the methods described in this article, these two varieties can be distinguished.
作者 胡双丰
出处 《中国当代医药》 2009年第4期41-41,45,共2页 China Modern Medicine
关键词 欧当归 当归 替代 差别 European angelica Angelica sinensis Substitute Difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1郝近大整理谢宗万讲授实用中药材经验鉴别[M]. 被引量:1
  • 2中华人民共和国卫生部药政管理局,中国药品生物制品检定所主编..中药材手册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1990:925.

同被引文献51

引证文献9

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部