摘要
目的:探寻治疗重度自闭症患儿的有效疗法。方法:将69例患儿分为靳三针组(35例)、行为干预组(34例)。靳三针组采用以头部穴组为主要针刺取穴的靳三针疗法,包括四神针、智三针、脑三针等;行为干预组通过自闭症儿童特殊训练学校进行专业的行为干预综合治疗。运用儿童自闭症评估量表(Childhood Autism Rating Scale,CARS)对治疗前后的疗效进行评价。结果:经2个疗程(240次)治疗后,靳三针组的显效率为97.1%,行为干预组为64.7%,组间疗效差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);且第1疗程(前120次)及第2疗程(后120次)治疗后,靳三针组疗效均明显优于行为干预组(均P<0.001);两组自身各疗程的治疗前后比较差异亦有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:靳三针及行为干预疗法对重度儿童自闭症都有较好的疗效,且靳三针疗法的治疗效果更为突出。
Objective To find out an effective therapy for severe child autism. Methods Sixty-nine autism children were divided into a JIN’s 3-needling group （n=35） and a behavior intervention group （n=34）. The JIN’s needling group was treated with JIN’s 3-needling therapy, including Four-shen needling, Zhi-three needling and Nao-three needling, etc. with point group of the head selected as main points; and the behavior intervention group with professional behavior intervention comprehensive therapy in a special training school for autism children. Childhood autism rating scale （CARS） was used for evaluation of therapeutic effects. Results After 2 therapeutic courses （240 sessions）, the markedly effective rate was 97.1% in the JIN’s 3-needling group and 64.7% in the behavior intervention group; there was a significant difference in the therapeutic effect between the two groups （P〈0.01）; after the first course （first 120 session） and the second course （later 120 sessions）, there was a very significant difference between the two groups （P〈0.001）; and there were significant differences before and after treatment in the courses in the two groups （P〈0.01）. Conclusion Both the JIN’s 3-needling therapy and the behavior intervention therapy have better therapeutic effects on severe child autism, but the therapeutic effect of JIN’s 3-needling is much better.
出处
《中国针灸》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2009年第3期177-180,共4页
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
基金
国家中医药管理局中医临床诊疗技术整理与研究项目:2003ZL第49号
关键词
靳三针
儿童自闭症
评价研究
JIN-Three Needlimg
Children Autistic Disorder
Evaluation Studies
