摘要
唐代初期《五经正义》的问世使经学得到空前统一,而奉敕编纂《五经正义》的孔颖达于"三传"中独选《左传》以释《春秋》、并屡屡强经就传之举,使《左传》在《春秋》经传中的地位呈独尊之势,"遗经存传"之风盛行。但"安史之乱"后,以啖助、赵匡等为代表的"新春秋学"派却独尊《春秋》,对《左传》进行了诸多质疑和贬抑。而啖、赵此举已不仅仅是纯粹的学术探讨,更是为了实现其政治理想的必需之举,体现出了一片拳拳救世之心。
The coming-into-beingof the Correct Interpretation of the Five Classics in the early period of the Tang Dynasty brought about an unprecedented unity in the studies on Confucian Classics in history. Kong Yingda, who compiled the Correct Interpretation of the Five Classics under imperial instructions, only chose Zuo Chuan （the Zuo Commentary or Master Zuo＇s Spring and Autumn Annals ） out of the ＂three Commentaries＂ as reference to interpret the Spring and Autumn Annals and he repeatedly rendered his interpretation in conformity to the Zuo Commentary, making the Zuo Commentary the predominant authority in interpreting the Spring and Autumn Annals. There was even a prevailing tendency of ＂keeping the Zuo Commentary while deserting the Classics＂ at that time. However, Dan Zhu, Zhao Kuang and others, who were representatives of the New School of Studies on the Spring and Autumn Annals, greatly questioned and depreciated the Zuo Commentary after the ＂Rebellion of An Lushan and Shi Siming＂ in the Mid-Tang Dynasty. Dan Zhu, Zhao Kuang, etc. had lost the pure academic manner due to their political ideals in their books. Certainly, they showed their sincere concern over the future of their country.
出处
《南阳师范学院学报》
CAS
2008年第11期52-55,共4页
Journal of Nanyang Normal University
关键词
新春秋学
啖助、赵匡、陆淳
左传学
贬抑
New School of Studies on the Spring and Autumn Annals
Dan Zhu, Zhao Kuang, Lu Chun
studies on the Zuo Commentary
depreciation
