期刊文献+

脑外伤后综合征患者综合干预效果评价 被引量:3

The influence of comprehensive intervention on patients with post-traumatic brain syndrome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨脑外伤后综合征患者的综合干预效果。方法将110例脑外伤后综合征患者随机分为研究组56例,对照组54例,两组均进行常规的脑外伤治疗及躯体康复,研究组在此基础上联合综合干预,观察8w。于综合干预前及干预8w末,采用症状自评量表评定患者的躯体症状及心理健康状况,采用总体幸福感量表评定患者的幸福度。结果两组干预前症状自评量表躯体化、抑郁、焦虑、强迫症状、敌对及恐怖等因子分较高,干预8w末研究组各因子分较干预前均显著下降,而对照组较康复前均有显著提高;研究组除恐怖因子外,其他各因子分均显著低于对照组(P〈0.01)。干预8w末,总体幸福感量表评分两组均较干预前有显著提高,研究组较对照组提高更为显著(t=3.48,P〈0.01)。结论综合干预有助于改善患者的心理、生理、情感和社会功能,从而提高患者的生活质量和康复效果。 Objective To investigate the influence of comprehensive intervention on the patients with post-traumatic brain syndrome. Methods 110 patients with post-traumatic brain syndrome were randomly divided into study group (56 cases) and control group (54cases) . The two groups were given regular brain injury treatment and physical rehabilitation, and the study group given comprehensive intervention at the same time. The Symptoms Checklist 90(SCL 90) and Global Well-being Scale(GWB) were used to evaluate psychological status and level of well-being respectively before intervention and at the end of 8 weeks after intervention. Results Before intervention, the seorces of SCL-90 was not difference between the 2 groups were improved. After intervention, the scores of all factors of SCI. 90 in study group decreased obviously, but those in control group increased, and all the factors' seorces except phobia of SCL-90 in study group were significant lower than those in control group(P〈0.01). The scorces of GWB in both groups improved after intervention, and which in study group improved more than in control group(P〈0.01) . Conclusion The comprehensive intervention can improve the mental status and social function of the patients with post-traumatic brain syndrome in order to enhance their life quality and rehabilitation efficacy.
出处 《临床心身疾病杂志》 CAS 2009年第1期38-39,92,共3页 Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases
关键词 脑外伤后综合征 综合干预 生活质量 社会功能 症状自评量表 总体幸福感量表 Post-traumatic brain syndrome comprehensive intervention quality of life social function SCL-90 GWB
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献34

  • 1王征宇.症状自评量表[J].上海精神医学,1984,2:69-69. 被引量:25
  • 2Evans RW. The postconcussion syndrome and the sequelae of mild head injury. In: Evans RW, ed. Neurology and trauma[M].Philadephia: WB Saunders,1996.91-116. 被引量:1
  • 3Graham DI, Mclntosh TK. Neuropathology of brain injury. In:Evans RW,ed.Neurology and tramna[M].Philadephia: WB Saunders,1996.53-90. 被引量:1
  • 4Misic-Pavkov G, Bozic K. Subjective syndrome after head injury[J]. Medicinski Pregled, 1998,51(1-2):41-44. 被引量:1
  • 5Boter H, Rinkel GJ, de Haan RJ. HESTIA Study Group. Outreach nurse support after stroke: a descriptive study on patients' and carers needs, and applied nursing interventions. Clin Rehabil, 2004,18(2): 156-163. 被引量:1
  • 6Carnevale GJ, Anselmi V, Busichio K, et al. Changes in ratings of caregiver burden following a community-based behavior management program for persons with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 2002,17(2) : 83-95. 被引量:1
  • 7Kischell ER, Kehtarnarvaz N, Hillman GR, et al. Classification of brain compartments and head damage lesions by neural networks applied to MRI.Neuroradiology, 1995,37:535-541. 被引量:1
  • 8Laroi F. The family systems approach to treating families of persons with brain injury: a potential collaboration between family therapist and brain injury professional. Brain Inj,2003,17(2) :175-187. 被引量:1
  • 9Morris KC. Psychological distress in carers of bead injured individuals: the provision of written information. Brain Inj, 2001 Mar,15(3) :239-254. 被引量:1
  • 10Ponsford J, Olver J. Long-term adjustment of families following traumatic brain injury where comprehensive rehabilitation has been provided. Brain Inj,2003, 17(6) :453-468. 被引量:1

共引文献109

同被引文献27

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部