摘要
《三国志》裴松之注因为引用了几则具有志怪性质的材料,而被历来史家批评其"凿空语怪"、"坐长烦芜"。事实上,裴松之在引援这些注文时并非是不加选汰而盲目采用的。裴松之用审慎的态度和隐蔽的手段,把自己对历史人物及事实的评价暗蕴于注解之中。而且,其保存小说材料和用小说注史之功,是不可泯没的。《三国志》裴松之注将历史与小说相结合,则对当下的玄幻小说创作具有一定的启迪意义。
Pei Song-zhi＇s Notes about the Three Kingdoms have always been criticized by historians for not being based casually and saying strange things, because in the Notes, Pei song-zhi cited the strange nature of the materials. But in fact, Pei Song-zhi was not careless when he quoted these literary materials. Pei Song-zhi covertly expressed his assessment of the historical figures in the Notes with cautious approach and covert means. Moreover, his contribution to the preservation of its novel materials and the use of novel materials to create the Notes for the history books should not be ignored.
出处
《西南农业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2009年第1期143-146,共4页
Journal of Southwest Agricultural University:Social Science Edition
关键词
三国志
裴松之注
凿空语怪
文学意义
Three Kingdoms
Pei song-zhi＇s Note
not based casually saying strange things
literary meaning
