摘要
目的:探讨两种不同透析液血透后结果异同点。方法:对10例终末期肾衰采用醋酸盐透析(AHD组)1723例次、9例终末期肾衰采用碳酸盐透析(BHD组)1614例次,观察结果并比较。结果:两组透析后血BUN、Scr和电解质无明显差异(P>005),血HCO-3及氧分压BHD优于AHD(P<005),“醋酸盐不耐受”现象BHD比AHD轻。结论:碳酸盐透析较醋酸盐透析更接近人体正常生理。
OBJECTIVE: To identify difference between bicarbonate and acetate for blood dialysis. METHOD: 10 patients of alte kidney failute received acetate dialysis (group AHD) for totally 1723 times and another 9 patients received bicarbonate dialysis (group BHD) for totally 1614 times. RESULTS: There was no obvious difference in BUN, Scr and electrolyte between the two groups (P>005). Group BHD showed better result in HCO-3 and PO2 than group AHD (P<005). Acetate intolerance was milder in group BHD than that in group AHD. CONCLUSION: Bicarbonate dialysis is closer to normal human physiological status than acetate dialysis.
出处
《九江医学》
1998年第1期29-31,共3页
Jiujiang Medical Journal
关键词
碳酸氢盐
醋酸盐
血液透析
肾功能衰竭
治疗
bicarbonate dialysis/method
acetate dialysis/method
kidney failure, late
treatment