摘要
《纽约公约》第2条关于仲裁协议书面形式的规定构成了统一实体规则,该规则应优先于国内法加以适用。对涉及仲裁协议实质有效性的问题,各缔约国法院在"裁决后诉讼"中应按照《公约》第5条第1款(甲)项的统一冲突规范确定准据法;在"裁决前诉讼"中应类推适用《公约》第5条第1款(甲)项的统一冲突规范。对"双无仲裁协议",则由缔约国自行确定其实质有效性的准据法。我国法院在涉外仲裁协议法律适用方面应更好地执行《公约》的规定。
The applicable law of international （foreign） arbitration agreements has become the main concerns in recent years in Chinese practice of arbitration and trial. While the legislation of China have not yet made specific provisions on this matter, but Chinas approval was in 1987 involving the matter to the major international conventions - the New York Convention. The essay focused on the legislation of the Convention itself related to the legal validity of the form and substance of the arbitration agreement and international law academics and the authority of national courts to interpret the Convention, and it also paid particular attention to the 20 years Chinese judicial practice under the Convention on the law applicable to the arbitration agreement and concerning issues.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第2期161-168,共8页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
仲裁协议
法律适用
纽约公约
arbitration agreement
application of law
New York Convention
