摘要
当代中国马克思哲学解释中流行的文本学思路具有自身的界限。对文本学的过分张扬,可能会造成对理论本身的压抑。以"西方马克思学"为代表的对马克思文本可靠版本和"客观"分析的强调,本身是特定意识形态氛围中矫枉过正的学术动向。缺乏理论反思的文本解释,不仅造成解释理论本身的缺席,而且直接引发对马克思哲学本身性质的忽略。文本权威性和考据重要性只构成马克思哲学研究的基本方面,将之抬高到绝对规范的高度,不仅不是学术的荣耀,反而是理论的失落。让文本学回到文本那里,理论将在它的空地上重新诞生。
By analyzing the logic tensions of textology and reviewing important cases, it holds that, there are some limits to textological path of Marxian Philosophical Study in current China. If those limits are ignored, theory may lose its meaning for a researcher. To give prominence to credible versions and ＂objective＂ analysis of Marx＇s texts （so do as Western Marxology ）, is one kind of academic hypercorrection related to special ideological transformation. The interpretation of Marx＇s texts without theoretical reflections could not only neglect the theories of interpretations but also misunderstand the nature of Marxian philosophy. The authority of original texts and the importance of textual research is not absolute norm but some basic aspects of Marxian Philosophy study.
出处
《学术月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第2期27-36,共10页
Academic Monthly
基金
国家社科规划项目"恩格斯文本的哲学解读"(项目编号07CZX001)
南京大学人文社会科学高级研究院资助项目的阶段性成果
关键词
马克思恩格斯研究
文本研究
文本学
studies on Marx and Engels, textual research, textology
