摘要
当前中国社会经济问题的症结在公共领域,这涉及到一个整体性的制度安排问题,从而要求我们一方面遵循从本质到现象的分析思路,另一方面还需要建立起整体性的视野。但学术界却表现出两种极端对立的倾向:一是基于马克思主义的教条,另一是基于新古典经济学的教条。前者发展了探究社会事物内在本质的思路,却以马克思主义观点来作学术判断;后者提供了剖析现状的具体方法工具,却局限于西方理论来指导中国的改革实践。显然,两者都没有遵循完整的从本质到现象的分析线路,这是经济学理论与实践日益相脱节的重要原因。
The sticking point of present social and economic problems of China lies on the public field, which is related to the overall institution arrangement. Accordingly, we should follow the route from essence to phenomenon to build the overall view. However, there are two extremely opposite tendency in the academic circle： One is the doctrine based on Marxism while the other is based on the Neo-Classic Economics. The former offers and deepens the way of exploring the internal essence of social affairs, but judging the learning only by the viewpoints of Marxism; The latter offers the specific methods and tools to analyze the status quo, but limited on the western theory and practice to guide the reforming practice of China. Neither of them follows the intact analysis way from essence to phenomenon, which is the reason why the gap between theory and practice is becoming larger and larger.
出处
《改革与战略》
北大核心
2009年第2期15-21,共7页
Reformation & Strategy
基金
广东省哲学社会科学"十一五"规划2007年度一般项目<中国经济学范式探索>
批准号:07D05
