摘要
目的:比较透穴针刺法与传统针刺法配合推拿、TDP治疗顽固性面瘫的临床疗效及疗程。方法:随机选取顽固性面瘫患者128例,分为透穴针刺法治疗组64例,传统针刺法对照组64例。分别采用透穴针刺法与传统针刺法配合推拿、TDP治疗,5次/周,1周为1疗程,4个疗程后进行评价。结果:治疗组临床痊愈27例,显效28例,有效6例,无效3例,总有效率95.31%,对照组分别为18例、29例、13例、4例,总有效率93.75%,组间比较差异有显著性(P<0.05);临床痊愈患者平均疗程分别为2.96、3.56个,组间比较差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论:针刺配合推拿、TDP治疗顽固性面瘫疗效确切,但透穴针刺法疗效明显优于传统针刺法,且能明显缩短疗程。
Objective： To compare therapeutic effect and course of the the refractory facial paralysis between the point-through-point acupuncture and traditional acupuncture combined with massage, TDP. Methods： randomly selected refractory patients with 128 cases of facial paralysis, 64 cases for the penetrating acupuncture group, 64 cases for the traditional acupuncture group. We used the point-through-point and traditional acupuncture combined with massage, TDP treatment, 5 times / week, 1 week/course of treatment, evaluation after 4 courses of the treatment. Result： Among the treatment group, 27 cases of clinical recovery, 28 cases of markedly effective, 6 cases of effective, 3 cases of invalid, and the total efficiency was 95.31%, which in the control group were 18 cases, 29 cases, 13 cases and 4 cases, the total effective rate was 93.75%, there were significant differences of the comparison groups （P 〈0.05）; The average treatment of patients with clinical recovery were 2.96 and 3.56, there were significant differences of the comparison groups （P 〈0.05）. Conclusion： The curative effect of curing refi＇actory facial paralysis with acupuncture,massage and TDP was good, but the efficacy of point-through-point acupuncture was superior to the traditional acupuncture, which can significantly shorten the course of treatment.
出处
《临床医学工程》
2009年第2期38-39,共2页
Clinical Medicine & Engineering
